This article conducts an in-depth study of the effectiveness of agreements excluding revocation procedures in international commercial arbitration. First of all, the paper discusses the definition and characteristics of arbitration, as well as the development trend of international commercial arbitration, and emphasizes the criticality of arbitration agreements in commercial transactions. Subsequently, the role and purpose of the annulment procedure were analyzed, its importance in the arbitration system was analyzed, and the setting of exclusion conditions was studied in depth, paying special attention to the role of the parties' will and negotiation, as well as the specific exclusion clauses in the agreement. A comprehensive examination of arbitration clauses and other alternatives is provided by analyzing the provisions of domestic and international law that exclude revocation proceedings. The paper provides profound theoretical and practical guidance for the parties to formulate agreements to exclude revocation procedures in international commercial arbitration.

Qi Sun. Issues Concerning the Validity of Agreements Excluding Rescission Procedures in International Commercial Arbitration. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 2: 24-35. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060205.

[1] Peter W, de Kuyper J Q, de Candolle B. Arbitration and renegotiation of international investment agreements: a study with particular reference to means of conflict avoidance under natural resources investment agreements [M]. Kluwer Law International BV, 1995.

[2] Bermann G A. The gateway problem in international commercial arbitration [J]. Yale J. Int'l L., 2012, 37: 1.

[3] McConnaughay P J. Risks and virtues of lawlessness: a second look at international commercial arbitration [J]. Nw. UL Rev., 1998, 93: 453.

[4] Ferrari F, Czernich D, Rosenfeld F. Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration [J]. Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration, 2020: 1-488.

[5] Kronstein H. Business Arbitration--Instrument of Private Government [J]. Yale LJ, 1944, 54: 36.

[6] Cremades B M, Plehn S L. The new lex mercatoria and the harmonization of the laws of international commercial transactions [J]. BU Int'l LJ, 1983, 2: 317.

[7] Puspita L, Budiono A R, Kusumadara A, et al. The Dilemma of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia [J]. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 2023, 6(1): 114-121.

[8] Müller C. Swiss Contract Law in International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2023.

[9] Lee S I. Study on Drafting Appropriate Dispute Resolution Clause in International Contract [J]. J. Arb. Stud., 2019, 29: 39.

[10] Obiri-Korang P. Party autonomy: promoting legal certainty and predictability in international commercial contracts through choice of law (justicfiation) [J]. Journal of South African Law/Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2021, 2021(1): 43-58.

[11] Manik J D N. Fair Arbitration Decision for Parties to the Dispute Based on The Act Arbitration[C]//Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019). Atlantis Press, 2020: 64-68.

[12] Petrochilos G. Procedural detachment in international commercial arbitration: the law applicable to arbitral procedure [D]. University of Oxford, 2000.