Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(3); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060301.

RDEU Game Model Analysis of Prevention and Control Behavior in Public Health Emergencies under Different Emotional States

Author(s)

Yining Mao, Jiangxiao Hou

Corresponding Author:
Yining Mao
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China

Abstract

Analyzing the role of public and government emotions in their prevention and control behavior in public health emergencies will help the government better control the development trend of the event, reduce social losses, and enhance the public's awareness of taking corresponding measures. This article is based on the theory of expected utility of hierarchy and constructs an RDEU game model for strategy selection when the public and government face public health emergencies. It explores the existence of Nash equilibrium under different emotional states and analyzes the evolutionary mechanism of public and government emergency prevention and control. The results indicate that the strategy choices of decision-makers vary due to different emotional states, and their evolution process, evolution speed, and the other party's strategy choices will also change accordingly. The impact of negative emotions is more significant.

Keywords

Public health emergency; Emergency prevention and control; RDEU game model; Negative emotions; Positive emotions

Cite This Paper

Yining Mao, Jiangxiao Hou. RDEU Game Model Analysis of Prevention and Control Behavior in Public Health Emergencies under Different Emotional States. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060301.

References

[1] World Health Organisation. Framework for a public health emergency operations centre. Published 2015. Accessed November 20, 2020. Available from: https:// www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework -for-a-public-health-emergency- operations-centre

[2] Xu Yanqing, Yao Hong. Research on Digital Governance of Major Public Health Emergencies from the Perspective of Supply and Demand[J]. China Administrative Management, 2023, 39(10): 131-139. DOI: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2023.10.15

[3] Rose DA, Murthy S, Brooks J. The evolution of public health emergency management as a field of practice[J]. Am J Public Health, 2017, 107: 126-133. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303947

[4] Ning Liangwen, Hao Yanhua, Liu Ze, Niu Jinyu, Bi Xuejing, Zhang Peng, Kang Zheng, Yang Chao. Research on the importance of influencing factors of high compliance behavior of the public in China under the background of the normalization of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control - based on the random forest model[J]. China Public Health, 2021, 37(07): 1096-1100.

[5] Wei Jiuchang. Research progress and prospects on the evolution of risk perception and protective behavior of the public towards public health emergencies[J]. Chinese Science Foundation, 2020, 34(06): 776-785.

[6] Dai B, Fu D, Meng G, Liu B, Li Q, Liu X. The effects of governmental and individual predictors on COVID-19 protective behaviors in China: a path analysis model[J]. Public Administration Review, 2020, 80(5): 797-804.

[7] Wu Yidong, Chen Zhuo, Chen Jie. Historical memory and residents' awareness of risk and hardship -- based on the long-term impact of SARS on the prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic[J]. Industrial Economic Review, 2021, (03): 19-33.

[8] Tang Lina, Gai Qinbao, Deng Wenqing, Wang Weidong. The characteristics and influencing factors of self-protection behavior of Chinese residents during the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, 25(04): 389-394.

[9] Lindell M K, Sorensen J H, Baker E J, Lehman W P. Community response to hurricane threat: Estimates of household evacuation preparation time distributions[J]. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 2020, 8: 102457.

[10] Zhang X J, Wang F F, Zhu C W, Wang Z Q. Willingness to self-isolate when facing a pandemic risk: model, empirical test, and policy recommendations[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(1): 197.

[11] Webster R K, Brooks S K, Smith L E, Woodland L, Wessely S, Rubin G J. How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence[J]. Public Health, 2020, 182: 163-169.

[12] Li Jing, Wang Shuhong, Yu Renhe, Hu Jianzhong, Jiang Mengting, Huang Weihong. Compliance of people's isolation and protection at home during the COVID-19 and its impact on anxiety[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection Control, 2020,19(05): 404-410.

[13] Wong L P, Sam I C. Behavioral responses to the influenza A(H1N1) outbreak in Malaysia[J]. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2011, 34: 23-31.

[14] Sayegh L, Anthony W P, Perrewe P L. Managerial decision — making under crisis: the role of emotion in an intuitive decision process[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2004, 14(2): 179-199.

[15] Quiggin J. Comparative statics for rank dependent expected utility theory[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1991, 4(4): 339-350.