With the continuous deepening of the socialization of university logistics, accurately evaluating the service quality of social catering enterprises contracted to operate university canteens has gradually become an important part of building first-class logistics services for "double first-class" universities. To construct a quantitative evaluation system for the satisfaction of teachers and students with the university canteen, this paper adopts the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to build a satisfaction matrix. Without the need for professional statistical software, the traditional qualitative survey results are calculated and transformed into quantitative evaluation data, objectively evaluating the university canteen from multiple dimensions of concern to teachers and students, and urging point-to-point improvement directions. This provides a feasible canteen management solution for university logistics managers, allowing for quantitative comparison of different contracting enterprises, thereby more targeted improvement of catering service quality, and providing an effective and simple evaluation system for building world-class logistics support services.

Kun Zhang, Hongfei Guo, Liyun Liu. Research on Satisfaction Assessment of Catering Enterprises Undertaking College Canteens Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 6: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060611.

[1] Tregear A, Aničić Z, Arfini F, et al. Routes to sustainability in public food procurement: An investigation of different models in primary school catering[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 3(1): 338.

[2] Schaubroeck T, Ceuppens S, Luong AD, et al. A pragmatic framework to score and inform about the environmental sustainability and nutritional profile of canteen meals, a case study on a university canteen[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,6(20): 672-686.

[3] Maietta OW, Gorgitano MT, et al. School meals and pupil satisfaction: Evidence from Italian primary schools[J]. Food Policy, 2016, 62: 41-55.

[4] Liu R, Grunert KG. Satisfaction with food-related life and beliefs about food health, safety, freshness and taste among the elderly in China: A segmentation analysis[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2020, 79: 103775.

[5] Adamchuk DV, Arinushkina AA, Neustroev SS. Satisfaction of parents of schoolchildren with various aspects of the food management system at schools: Data from Russia[J]. Data in Brief, 2020, 31: 105725.

[6] Abou-Zeid P, Van Gossum A, Csergö M. Evaluation of the satisfaction of cancer patients with hospital catering[J]. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2020, 40: 564.

[7] Bux C, Zizzo G, Amicarelli V. A combined evaluation of energy efficiency, customer satisfaction and food waste in the healthcare sector by comparing cook-hold and cook-chill catering[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 429: 139594.

[8] Mohammadi Z, Bhati AS, Radomskaya V, et al. The influence of special dietary needs on tourist satisfaction and behavioral intention: Satisfiers or dissatisfiers?[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2023, 27: 100759.

[9] Tóth ÁJ, Dunay A, Illés CB, et al. Food liking and consumption in schools: Comparison of questionnaire-based surveys with real consumption[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2023, 103: 104692.

[10] Liang W, Yang Y, Qi K, et al. Quality evaluation of multi-path laser cladding coatings based on integrated fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and improved analytical hierarchy process method[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2021, 427: 127816.

[11] Du Q, Sun Z, Duan Z. The Performance Evaluation Model of Troops Logistics Construction Based on The Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2013, 46(24): 224-228.

[12] Wang H, Cheng M, Zhang S, et al. Optimization of irrigation amount and fertilization rate of drip-fertigated potato based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation methods[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 256: 107130.

[13] Zhang ML, Yang WP. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method Applied in the Real Estate Investment Risks Research[J]. Physics Procedia, 2010, 24: 1815-1821.

[14] Ahmed I, Das (Pan) N, Debnath J, et al. Flood hazard zonation using GIS-based multi-parametric Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 2024, 3(2): 100250.

[15] Alharasees O, Kale U, Rohacs J, et al. Green building energy: Patents analysis and analytical hierarchy process evaluation[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(8): e29442.

[16] Sarker S, Gani Adnan MS. Evaluating multi-hazard risk associated with tropical cyclones using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model[J]. Natural Hazards Research, 2024, 4(1): 97-109.

[17] Fan Y, Ma S. Integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process into ecosystem service-based spatial planning: A case study of the Shenyang metropolitan area, China[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2024, 81: 102625.