This paper explores the complex relationship between gender and digital media technologies, emphasising how gender significantly influences our engagement with digital technologies and vice versa. It delves into the historical context, highlighting the persistence of gender disparities in technology, largely due to the development of patriarchy. The paper pays particular attention to the #MeToo movement as a key case study to illustrate the empowerment of women and marginalised genders through social media platforms that provide them with a voice to share their experiences of sexual harassment and assault, challenging societal norms and traditional gender power dynamics. This analysis covers the strengths and weaknesses of digital media in shaping gender dynamics, recognising the role of digital media in breaking the silence on gender-based violence and elevating gender-related issues into the global discourse. However, it also addresses the limitations and challenges posed by the digital divide and the potential for online harassment and victim blaming. Finally, the paper argues for the need to create more inclusive, equitable and diverse digital environments in the future. Recommendations are made to address algorithmic bias, improve digital literacy, ensure online safety, and advocate for supportive policies and inclusive design as key steps towards gender equality in the digital age.

Ziyi Wang. Gender and Digital Technology: A Comprehensive Analysis of History, Culture, and Gender-Technology Interaction. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 7: 62-66. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060710.

[1] Cockburn, C. (1992). ‘The Circuit of Technology: Gender, Identity and Power’ in Hirsch, E. & Silverstone, R. (eds.) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge: 32–48.

[2] Helen, T. (2019). Gender and Digital Culture: between Irreconcilability and the Datalogical, Routledge. https://keats.kcl.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/9466288/mod_resource/content/1/ Gender% 20and% 20Digital% 20Culture%20Between% 20Irreconcilability%20and%20the%20 Datalogical% 20%28 Helen% 20Thornham%29.pdf.

[3] Basset, C. (2013). ‘Feminism, Expertise and the Computational Turn’ in Thornham, H. & Weismann, E. (eds.) Renewing Feminisms: Radical Narratives, Fantasies and Futures in Media Studies. London: I.B.Tauris: 199–215.

[4] Mazzuca, C., Majid, A., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R. and Borghi, A.M. (2020). Gender Is a Multifaceted concept: Evidence That Specific Life Experiences Differentially Shape the Concept of Gender. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ugv43.

[5] European Institute for Gender Equality (2023). Gendered Patterns in Use of New Technologies. [online] European Institute for Gender Equality. Available at: https://eige.europa.eu/ publications-resources/ toolkits-guides/gender-equality-index -2020-report/gendered-patterns-use -new- technologies?language_content_entity=en.

[6] Rawat, P.S. (2014). Patriarchal Beliefs, Women’s Empowerment, and General Well-being. Vikalpa: the Journal for Decision Makers, [online] 39(2), pp.43–56. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0256090920140206.

[7] Bowman, J., Singh, W., Mezey, N. and Singh, L. (2019). #MeToo as Catalyst: a Glimpse into 21st Century Activism #MeToo as Catalyst: a Glimpse into 21st Century Activism #MeToo as Catalyst: a Glimpse into 21 St Century Activism. U. Chi. Legal F., 371. [online] Available at: https:// chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1658&context=uclf.

[8] Zarkov, D. and Davis, K. (2018). Ambiguities and Dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow Long and #WhereTo? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), pp.3–9. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 1350506817749436.

[9] Fileborn, B. and Loney-Howes, R. (2019). #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.21–35.

[10] Information on: https://milwaukee-criminal-lawyer.com/ the-metoo-movement-and-its-impact-in- the-united-states/.