Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2024, 6(8); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2024.060803.

Research on the Impact of Flexible Employment on Household Income Tax Burden

Author(s)

Cong Wang

Corresponding Author:
Cong Wang
Affiliation(s)

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

Abstract

Under the background of China's burgeoning internet technology and the advanced development of its tertiary sector, flexible employment has emerged as a novel labor arrangement. This paper draws on statistical data from the 2019 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) database to examine the impact of flexible employment on household income tax burdens. The findings reveal a significant negative effect of flexible employment on household income tax burdens, particularly pronounced in the eastern region compared to the western and central regions. This suggests that flexible employees, compared to formal employees, are more likely to evade taxes and may earn lower incomes. Consequently, governmental and corporate efforts should focus on providing on-the-job training and opportunities for further education to flexible workers, establishing professional evaluation and promotion channels for them, and developing tax evasion early warning mechanisms within tax authorities.

Keywords

flexible employment; household; income tax burden

Cite This Paper

Cong Wang. Research on the Impact of Flexible Employment on Household Income Tax Burden. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 8: 21-26. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060803.

References

[1] International Labour Organization. World non-standard employment: understanding challenges, shaping the future. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2016.

[2] Qi Y, Ding S, Liu C. Internet use and labor supply of flexible workers in the context of the digital economy: theory and evidences[J]. Contemporary finance & economics. 2021, (05): 3-16.

[3] Mulcahy D. Will the gig economy make the office obsolete? [J]. Harvard business review. 2017(03):2-4.

[4] Zhang X, Wan G, Wu H. Narrowing the digital divide: the development of digital finance with Chinese characteristics [J]. Social sciences in China, 2021(8):35-51.

[5] Wood A J, Mark G, Vili L, et al. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy[J].Work employment and society, 2019, 33(1):56-75.

[6] Bauernschuster S, Falck O, Woessmann L. Surfing alone? The internet and social capital: evidence from an unforeseeable technological mistake[J]. Journal of public economics, 2014, 117(1):73-89.

[7] He Q, Yang Y, Cheng Y. A study on the differences in the factors affecting the employment choice of platform-type flexible employment workers in the shared economy: a case study of “We dong network”[J]. Macroeconomics, 2019, (08):142-155.

[8] Zhang K, Liu C, Ding S. Research on the wage differences between formal employment and informal employment [J]. Chinese journal of population science, 2018,(01):83-94+128.

[9] Sun H, Zhu L, Gao G. The wage disadvantage of informal employees in different sectors—based on multiple selection bias correction[J]. Labor economic review, 2021, 14(02):211-247.

[10] Karabarbounis L, Neiman B. The global decline of the labor share[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 2013, 129(01):61-103.

[11] Ding S, Xia Z. On the regulation of flexible employment in the context of digital economy[J]. Theoretical exploration, 2022, 253(01):114-119.

[12] Tang J. The negative impact of unfair tax treatment on non self-employed flexible workers[J]. Taxation research, 2008,(10):92-94.

[13] Li C, Wang Y. On the working status and career development of flexible employees[J]. Journal of China University of Labor Relations, 2022, 36(04):31-37.