The seismic dynamic response and damage distribution law of Tianning Temple Pagoda are investigated by establishing a finite element model of the ancient pagoda using ABAQUS analysis software. The dynamic characteristics are computed and compared with the numerical results obtained from empirical formula calculations. This comparison serves to validate the rationality of the model. According to the type of site and seismic design parameters, three seismic waves are selected as the ground motion, the acceleration and displacement response of ancient pagoda are calculated, and the vulnerable parts of Tianning Temple pagoda under earthquake are analyzed combined with the structural damage cloud map.The results indicate that the seventh level of Tianning Temple Tower has the most pronounced acceleration amplification effect, with the broadest range of horizontal interlayer displacement angles. The sixth layer exhibits the greatest horizontal displacement, distinguished by a rapid transition between the horizontal displacement and the displacement of the above layer. The oldest stratum of the Ancient pagoda exhibits the most extensive spectrum of tensile damage, the highest cumulative damage factor, and a somewhat severe level of damage. The findings can serve as a definitive guide for seismic protection of antique pagodas.

Ye Jun. Earthquake Response and Damage Analysis of Tianning Temple Pagoda. Academic Journal of Architecture and Geotechnical Engineering (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 4: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJAGE.2024.060404.

[1] Qin Zheng, LING Ruizhou. Analysis of Tianning Tower in Yizheng [J]. Housing and Real Estate,2018(30):236.

[2] Li Dehu, He Jiang. Experimental Study on Dynamic Characteristics of ancient masonry pagodas [J]. Sichuan Building Science Research,1990(04):27-29.

[3] Chen Ping, Yao Qian-feng, Zhao Dong. Research on seismic resistance of Big Wild Goose Pagoda in Xi 'an [J]. Journal of Building Structures,1999,(01):46-49.

[4] Wei Junya, Zhang Dongping. Research on dynamic Characteristics of ancient masonry pagoda [J]. Earthquake Resistance and Reinforcement Engineering,2008,30(5):103-106.

[5] Pasticier L,Amadio C, Fragiacomo M.Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of amasonry building by means of the SAP2000 V.10 code[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 37(3).

[6] Rajendra S, Linh A, R. B A, et al. Case study: Post-earthquake model updating of aheritage pagoda masonry temple using AEM and FEM[J]. Engineering Structures,2020, 206(C):3127-31.

[7] Antonella Saisi .Post-earthquake diagnostic investigation of a historic masonry tower[J]. Carmelo Gentile.Journal of Cultural Heritage,2015,16: 602-609.

[8] Liu Xue. Research on clean brick Wall of Traditional Architecture in Fuhe River Basin [D]. Wuhan University,2022.

[9] Yang Weizhong. Constitutive Relation Model of masonry under pressure [J]. Building Structures, 2008(10):80-82.

[10] Zheng Nina, Li Yingmin, Pan Yi. Seismic performance of low-rise masonry structures confined by mandrel columns [J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2011,46(01):24-29+55.

[11] Han Xin, Lu Junlong, Wei Jun, et al. Dynamic performance and earthquake damage mechanism of Baiyun Tower in Xi 'an [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics,20,37(03):1305-1313+1408.

[12] Jiang Shan, Li Jianbo, Zhao Huiqiang, et al. Seismic dynamic response and damage analysis of brick tower in Jiwangshan, Shanxi Province [J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022,44(02):165-173.