Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2024, 6(9); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2024.060925.
Qingzhao Liu1, Meijun Liu2
1College of Business Administration, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila, Philippines
2College of Business Administration, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila, Philippines
Although creating economic value is the cornerstone of corporate and social prosperity, promoting the sustainable development of enterprises and social environment requires the support of corporate social responsibility. The continuous advancement of globalization has highlighted the importance of corporate social responsibility. This article mainly focuses on the implementation of corporate social responsibility in the manufacturing industry. From the perspectives of sustainable development theory, stakeholder theory, and reputation theory, combined with the survey of manufacturing companies, this article measures the company's social responsibility implementation from the dimensions of corporate social responsibility factors, social responsibility policies, and social responsibility activities, as well as the relationship between the dimensions, and puts forward optimization suggestions for corporate social responsibility policies and activities.
Social responsibility policy, social responsibility activities
Qingzhao Liu, Meijun Liu. Research on the impact of corporate social responsibility policies on corporate activities and reputation. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 9: 177-183. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060925.
[1] Sheldon O. The philosophy of management[M]. Routledge, 2004.
[2] Carroll A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J]. Academy of management review, 1979, 4(4): 497-505.
[3] Barnett M L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility[J]. Academy of management review, 2007, 32(3): 794-816.
[4] Kramer M R, Porter M E. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility[J]. Harvard business review, 2006, 84(12): 78-92.
[5] Freeman R E, Harrison J S, Wicks A C. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success[M]. Yale University Press, 2007.
[6] Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource‐based views[J]. Strategic management journal, 1997, 18(9): 697-713.
[7] Peng M W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J]. Academy of management review, 2003, 28(2): 275-296.
[8] DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American sociological review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160.