A good corporate image and reputation will help companies quickly gain the trust of stakeholders such as consumers, investors, communities, and employees, and achieve sustainable development. This article mainly focuses on the fulfillment of social responsibility by manufacturing enterprises. From the perspectives of sustainable development theory, stakeholder theory, and reputation theory, combined with the survey results of manufacturing enterprises, this paper measures the company's social responsibility performance from various dimensions such as corporate social responsibility factors, social responsibility policies, frequency of social responsibility activities, company reputation, and organizational citizenship behavior, as well as the interrelationships between these dimensions. It also proposes optimization suggestions for corporate social responsibility policies and activities.

Qingzhao Liu, Yuge Song. Research on the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance on Corporate Reputation and Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 9: 204-210. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060928.

[1] Morgeson F P, Aguinis H, Waldman D A, et al. Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future[J]. Personnel psychology, 2013, 66(4): 805-824.

[2] Clarkson M E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance [J]. Academy of management review, 1995, 20(1): 92-117.

[3] Mitchell R K, Agle B R, Wood D J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts[J]. Academy of management review, 1997, 22(4): 853-886.

[4] Jensen M C. Value maximization and stakeholder theory[J]. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge. July, 2000, 24.

[5] Barnett M L, Jermier J M, Lafferty B A. Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape[J]. Corporate reputation review, 2006, 9: 26-38.

[6] Berens G, Van Riel C B M. Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature[J]. Corporate reputation review, 2004, 7: 161-178.

[7] Fombrun C, Shanley M. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy[J]. Academy of management Journal, 1990, 33(2): 233-258.

[8] Brammer S J, Pavelin S. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit[J]. Journal of management studies, 2006, 43(3): 435-455.

[9] Stanaland A J S, Lwin M O, Murphy P E. Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of business ethics, 2011, 102: 47-55.

[10] Brown T J, Dacin P A. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses[J]. Journal of marketing, 1997, 61(1): 68-84.

[11] Settoon R P, Bennett N, Liden R C. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1996, 81(3): 219.

[12] Blau P. Exchange and power in social life[M]. Routledge, 2017.