In recent years, there has been a proliferation of false litigation cases, and the dispute handling has become increasingly diverse and complex. This has put traditional manual governance methods into a predicament, seriously jeopardizing the credit of judicial litigation. Under such circumstances, courts in Zhejiang province are starting to explore the litigation credit evaluation system. Through field investigation and case search, they examine the current status quo and difficulties of the implementation of the litigation credit evaluation system in Zhejiang province. Meanwhile, the courts also analyze the causes of the implementation difficulties, summarize the universal experience of implementing the litigation credit evaluation system in Zhejiang province and propose countermeasures, thus further constructing the social credit systems.

Fan Shuyi, Zhu Yinan. Practice and Experience of Litigation Credit Assessment System in Zhejiang Province. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 9: 11-17. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060903.

[1] Research Group of People's Procuratorate of Shaanxi Province, Wang Xuguang: "Research on Procuratorial Supervision of Civil False Litigation", Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), No. 2, 2024. 

[2] Zhao Jie: "People's Courts punish false lawsuits with Heavy punishments", Rule of Law Daily, April 15, 2021, page 6.

[3] Huang Wenyi. "On Preventive Rule of Law", Law Research, No. 2, 2024.

[4] See Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, The Big Data Jury, Notre Dame Law Review(2016).

[5] Liu Qianqian, On Civil Prosecutorial Supervision of False Litigation, Master degree thesis of Hebei University, 2022.

[6] Zhao Min: Research on the Judicial Practice of the Crime of False Litigation, Master degree thesis of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2022.

[7] Sun Guangning, "The status and operation of Guiding Cases in Class Case retrieval Mechanism", Application of Law, No. 12, 2020.

[8] Ding Yao. "Extension and Path Construction of Fake Arbitration Legal Supervision Theory under the Digital Procuratorial Perspective", Lanzhou Journal, No.3, 2014.

[9] Chen Luolan, "On the Construction of Digital Community of Courts: From the perspective of AI-Assisted Justice", Law, No. 1, 2024.

[10] Article 33 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China states: "All citizens of the People's Republic of China are equal before the law.";Article 4 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "the law shall be applied equally to anyone who commits a crime."

[11] Sun Haibo, "The Construction of the Theory of Judicial Obligation", Tsinghua Law, No.3, 2017.

[12] See Sun Daocui, "Knowledge Deconstruction and Response Logic of Intelligent Criminal Justice in China", Contemporary Law, No. 3, 2019.

[13] See Chen Xingliang, Zhang Mingkai, and Che Hao, "Legislation, Judicature, and Academia: Two Decades of Chinese Criminal Law Review and Prospects", China Law Review, No.5, 2017.

[14] See Chao Zhang, "Building a Smart Court Information System Based on the" 1+X "Model," Software Guide Journal, No. 3,2019.

[15] See Lu Li, "On the Collaborative Governance Mechanism of Financial Justice and Financial Supervision", Chinese Law, No.2, 2021.

[16] Li Zhanguo, "Construction and Implementation of Universal Digital Court", Chinese and Foreign Law, No. 1, 2022.

[17] See Zhang Muyao, "Research on the Setting of Market Credit Supervision Authority", Credit Investigation, 7th issue, 2022.