Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2024, 7(10); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2024.071015.
Jian Xue, Xu Guo
School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China
The robustness of interdependent networks is critical to the stability of vital infrastructures, including power grids, transportation, and communication systems, all of which underpin global security, economic continuity, and societal resilience. Increasing disruptions caused by natural disasters, cyberattacks, and systemic risks underscore the need for research into enhancing the robustness of these networks. This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of 4,627 publications from 2007 to 2023, conducted using CiteSpace software to uncover key trends, influential studies, and emerging research areas in the field of interdependent network robustness. The analysis examines publication trends, core authors, leading research institutions, core journals, and highly cited papers, highlighting significant advancements in theoretical models, empirical findings, and applications for improving network resilience. Moreover, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and burst detection analyses reveal new research directions, such as the study of cascading failures and the integration of artificial intelligence in enhancing network robustness. These findings provide a roadmap for future research, offering valuable insights for addressing the challenges of ensuring the robustness of increasingly complex and interdependent systems.
Interdependent Networks, Network Robustness, Bibliometric Analysis, Visual Analysis
Jian Xue, Xu Guo. A Bibliometric Review of Research on the Robustness of Interdependent Networks. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2024), Vol. 7, Issue 10: 105-118. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2024.071015.
[1] Artime O, Grassia M, De Domenico M, et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2024, 6(2): 114-131.
[2] Shao C, Shahidehpour M, Wang X, et al. Integrated planning of electricity and natural gas transportation systems for enhancing the power grid resilience[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(6): 4418-4429.
[3] Chen Z, Wu J, Xia Y, et al. Robustness of interdependent power grids and communication networks: A complex network perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2017, 65(1): 115-119.
[4] Jawad S, Liu J. Electrical vehicle charging services planning and operation with interdependent power networks and transportation networks: A review of the current scenario and future trends[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(13): 3371.
[5] Hong S, Wang B, Ma X, et al. Failure cascade in interdependent network with traffic loads[J]. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2015, 48(48): 485101.
[6] Zhang J, Zhang W, Lu Q, et al. A fragility-weighted topological network for resilient assessment of overhead power distribution system subjected to hurricane winds[J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2022, 8(2): 04022015.
[7] Zhang G, Li Z, Zhang B, et al. Understanding the cascading failures in Indian power grids with complex networks theory[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2013, 392(15): 3273-3280.
[8] Chen S M, Zou X Q, Lü H, et al. Research on robustness of interdependent network for suppressing cascading failure[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(2).
[9] Huang Z, Wang C, Stojmenovic M, et al. Characterization of cascading failures in interdependent cyber-physical systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2014, 64(8): 2158-2168.
[10] Alberto Y, De la Llera J C, Aguirre P, et al. Comparative qualitative and quantitative analyses of the seismic performance of water networks during the Maule 2010, Christchurch 2010–2011, and Tohoku 2011 earthquakes[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2022, 148(4): 04022004.
[11] Liu G, Yang H. A self-organizing method for predictive modeling with highly-redundant variables[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, 2015: 1084-1089.
[12] Gao J, Liu X, Li D, et al. Recent progress on the resilience of complex networks[J]. Energies, 2015, 8(10): 12187-12210.
[13] Mayr P, Scharnhorst A. Scientometrics and information retrieval: weak-links revitalized[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102: 2193-2199.
[14] Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[15] Abramo G, D'Angelo C A, Viel F. The field-standardized average impact of national research systems compared to world average: the case of Italy[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(2): 599-615.
[16] Levine‐Clark M, Gil E. A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools[J]. Online information review, 2009, 33(5): 986-996.
[17] Wang X, Fang Z, Sun X. Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 917-926.
[18] Ng J Y, Dhawan T, Dogadova E, et al. A comprehensive search string informed by an operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine for systematic bibliographic database search strategies[J]. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 2022, 22(1): 200.
[19] Singh V K, Singh P, Uddin A, et al. Exploring the relationship between journals indexed from a country and its research output: an empirical investigation[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(6): 2933-2966.
[20] Nguyen T V, Pham L T. Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: an analysis of ASEAN countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(1): 107-117.
[21] Győrffy B, Nagy A M, Herman P, et al. Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117: 409-426.
[22] Liu Y, Ravichandra Rao I K, Rousseau R. Empirical series of journal h-indices: The JCR category Horticulture as a case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80: 59-74.
[23] Noorian Z, Hosseini H, Ulieru M. An autonomous agent-based framework for self-healing power grid[C]//2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE, 2009: 1983-1988.
[24] Bonanni G, Ciancamerla E, Minichino M, et al. Exploiting stochastic indicators of interdependent infrastructures: the service availability of interconnected networks[J]. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, 2008, 3.
[25] Diallo A A, Chaudet C. An alternate topology generator for joint study of power grids and communication networks[C]//Critical Information Infrastructures Security: 4th International Workshop, CRITIS 2009, Bonn, Germany, September 30-October 2, 2009. Revised Papers 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 50-61.
[26] Casalicchio E, Galli E, Tucci S. Modeling and simulation of complex interdependent systems: A federated agent-based approach[C]//International Workshop on Critical Information Infrastructures Security. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 72-83.
[27] Agarwal P K, Efrat A, Ganjugunte S K, et al. Network vulnerability to single, multiple, and probabilistic physical attacks[C]//2010-MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE. IEEE, 2010: 1824-1829.
[28] Chadwick J E. How a smarter grid could have prevented the 2003 US cascading blackout[C]//2013 IEEE power and energy conference at Illinois (PECI). IEEE, 2013: 65-71.
[29] Xu C M, Yan Y, Zhu X W, et al. Structure and connectivity analysis of financial complex system based on g-causality network[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2013, 60(5): 630.
[30] Saracco F, Di Clemente R, Gabrielli A, et al. Detecting early signs of the 2007–2008 crisis in the world trade[J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6(1): 30286.
[31] Chen L, Yue D, Dou C, et al. The model of interdependent networks on china power grid[C]//2018 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference (ANZCC). IEEE, 2018: 391-396.
[32] Sheng J, Hu Y, Guan K, et al. Robustness analysis and defence strategy of an interdependent networks model based on closeness centrality[C]//2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom). IEEE, 2020: 1236-1241.
[33] Cheng Z, Cao J, Hayat T. Cascade of failures in interdependent networks with different average degree[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 2014, 25(05): 1440006.
[34] Zhang Y, Yang N. Vulnerability analysis of interdependent R&D networks under risk cascading propagation[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 505: 1056-1068.
[35] Bergsten A, Jiren T S, Leventon J, et al. Identifying governance gaps among interlinked sustainability challenges[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2019, 91: 27-38.
[36] Chai W K, Kyritsis V, Katsaros K V, et al. Resilience of interdependent communication and power distribution networks against cascading failures[C]//2016 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops. IEEE, 2016: 37-45.
[37] Bonamassa I, Gross B, Laav M, et al. Interdependent superconducting networks[J]. Nature Physics, 2023, 19(8): 1163-1170.
[38] Mitsova D. Integrative interdisciplinary approaches to critical infrastructure interdependency analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 2021, 41(7): 1111-1117.
[39] Mehvar S, Wijnberg K, Borsje B, et al. Towards resilient vital infrastructure systems–challenges, opportunities, and future research agenda[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2021, 21(5): 1383-1407.
[40] Xu P C, Lu Q C, Xie C, et al. Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, 179: 103907.
[41] Meng L, Yao X, Chen Q, et al. Vulnerability cloud: A novel approach to assess the vulnerability of critical infrastructure systems[J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2022, 34(21): e7131.
[42] Mumani A, Maghableh G. An integrated ANP-ELECTRE III decision model applied to eco-friendly car selection[J]. Journal of Engineering Research, 2022, 10(3A).
[43] Qazi A, Simsekler M C E, Gaudenzi B. Prioritizing multidimensional interdependent factors influencing COVID‐19 Risk[J]. Risk Analysis, 2022, 42(1): 143-161.
[44] Wang S, Yin J, Khan R U. Dynamic Safety Assessment and Enhancement of Port Operational Infrastructure Systems during the COVID-19 Era[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(5): 1008.
[45] Diem C, Borsos A, Reisch T, et al. Quantifying firm-level economic systemic risk from nation-wide supply networks[J]. Scientific reports, 2022, 12(1): 7719.
[46] Price D S. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes[J]. Journal of the American society for Information science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
[47] Liu X, Cao J, Yu W. Filippov systems and quasi-synchronization control for switched networks[J]. Chaos: an interdisciplinary journal of nonlinear science, 2012, 22(3).
[48] Li N, Cao J. Periodically intermittent control on robust exponential synchronization for switched interval coupled networks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2014, 131: 52-58.
[49] Bradford S C. Sources of information on specific subjects[J]. Engineering, 1934, 137: 85-86.
[50] Buldyrev S V, Parshani R, Paul G, et al. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7291): 1025-1028.
[51] Yu W, Chen G, Lü J. On pinning synchronization of complex dynamical networks[J]. Automatica, 2009, 45(2): 429-435.
[52] Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1): 1523.
[53] Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, et al. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation[J]. Nucleic acids research, 2016, 44(D1): D457-D462.
[54] Cong H P, Ren X C, Wang P, et al. Macroscopic multifunctional graphene-based hydrogels and aerogels by a metal ion induced self-assembly process[J]. ACS nano, 2012, 6(3): 2693-2703.
[55] Huttlin E L, Bruckner R J, Paulo J A, et al. Architecture of the human interactome defines protein communities and disease networks[J]. Nature, 2017, 545(7655): 505-509.
[56] Chen T, Liu X, Lu W. Pinning complex networks by a single controller[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2007, 54(6): 1317-1326.
[57] Burkle L A, Marlin J C, Knight T M. Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6127): 1611-1615.
[58] Lomenick B, Hao R, Jonai N, et al. Target identification using drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS)[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(51): 21984-21989.
[59] Venkatesh H S, Morishita W, Geraghty A C, et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits[J]. Nature, 2019, 573(7775): 539-545.
[60] Zhang X, Song Y, Wang S, et al. Exploring research trends and building a multidisciplinary framework related to brownfield: a visual analysis using citespace[J]. Complexity, 2021, 2021(1): 8882415.
[61] Wang G, Xu M, Wu Y, et al. Using machine learning for determining network robustness of multi-agent systems under attacks[C]//PRICAI 2018: Trends in Artificial Intelligence: 15th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing, China, August 28–31, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 15. Springer International Publishing, 2018: 491-498.
[62] Dhiman A, Sun P, Kooij R. Using machine learning to quantify the robustness of network controllability[C]//Machine Learning for Networking: Third International Conference, MLN 2020, Paris, France, November 24–26, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 3. Springer International Publishing, 2021: 19-39.
[63] Alkhaleel B A. Machine learning applications in the resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems—A systematic literature review[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2023: 100646.
[64] Hafeznia H, Stojadinović B. ResQ-IOS: An iterative optimization-based simulation framework for quantifying the resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems to natural hazards[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 349: 121558.
[65] Sicilia M Á, Santos L. Main elements of a basic ontology of infrastructure interdependency for the assessment of incidents[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
[66] Palomino A, Giraldo J, Parvania M. Graph-based interdependent cyber-physical risk analysis of power distribution networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2022, 38(3): 1510-1520.