Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2024, 6(11); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2024.061111.
Huawei Wan1,2
1School of Marxism, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, 571126, China
2School of Marxism, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430068, China
Aiming at the problems of low profitability, low resource utilization rate, low degree of system optimization and low degree of employee identification in the process of merger and integration of innovation-oriented enterprises, this paper uses two methods of common law and business model innovation perspective to compare the profitability, resource utilization, system optimization and employee identification of two innovation-oriented enterprises before and after merger and integration. From the perspective of business model innovation, the overall resource utilization rate of M company's M&A within 5 months is about 12.29% higher than the general method of M company's M&A within 5 months. From the perspective of business model innovation, the overall resource utilization rate of enterprise N after 5 months of merger and integration is about 12.58% higher than that of enterprise N after 5 months of merger and integration under the ordinary method, with higher profitability, higher degree of system optimization and higher employee recognition. The introduction of business model innovation perspective in the merger and integration of innovative enterprises can improve the profitability of enterprises, resource utilization, and system optimization and employee identification. It can be seen that business model innovation can better solve the merger and integration problem of innovative enterprises, so that innovative enterprises can get better development.
Business Model, Innovative Companies, Mergers and Acquisitions, Integration Issues
Huawei Wan. Integration of Innovative Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions from the Perspective of Business Model Innovation. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 11: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.061111.
[1] Han, John, Gil S. Jo, and Jina Kang. "Is high-quality knowledge always beneficial? Knowledge overlap and innovation performance in technological mergers and acquisitions." Journal of Management & Organization 24.2 (2018): 258-278.
[2] Benitez, Jose, Gautam Ray, and Jörg Henseler. "Impact of information technology infrastructure flexibility on mergers and acquisitions." MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 42.1 (2018): 25-43.
[3] Zhu, Hong, Qi Zhu, and Zhiwen Ding. "The roles of Chinese CEOs in managing individualistic cultures in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions." Journal of Management Studies 57.3 (2020): 664-697.
[4] Zhang, Yuchen, and Tony W. Tong. "How vertical integration affects firm innovation: quasi-experimental evidence." Organization Science 32.2 (2021): 455-479.
[5] Zhao, Xi, Delin Lin, and Ting Hao. "A new discussion on the relationship between M&A and innovation in an emerging market: the moderating effect of post-acquisition R&D investment." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31.12 (2019): 1447-1461.
[6] Brueller, Nir N., Abraham Carmeli, and Gideon D. Markman. "Linking merger and acquisition strategies to postmerger integration: A configurational perspective of human resource management." Journal of Management 44.5 (2018): 1793-1818.
[7] Feldman, Emilie R., and Exequiel Hernandez. "Synergy in Mergers and Acquisitions: Typology, Life Cycles, and Value." Academy of Management Review 47.4 (2022): 549-578.
[8] Kooli, Chokri, and Melanie Lock Son. "Impact of COVID-19 on mergers, acquisitions & corporate restructurings." Businesses 1.2 (2021): 102-114.