The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(11); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.061104.
Xinbin Fu1, Xueyuan Li2,3, Xintian Xiu4,5
1School of Marxism, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China
2Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
3School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
4School of Animal Sciences(School of Bee Sciences), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China
5Ecological Civilization Research Center, Fujian Social Science Research Base, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China
High-quality development of forestry is an important part of realizing ecological civilization construction and assisting carbon peak carbon neutral, based on the function of the "four reservoirs" to find out the strategic positioning of China's forestry development, reconstruct its value core and benefit orientation, and realize high-quality development, is a major issue of the times that concerns the strategic overall situation. It is of great practical significance to measure and evaluate the efficiency of high-quality development of forestry through the concept of forestry "four reservoirs". Through the data of 27 provinces and cities in China from 2012 to 2020, the study adopts the super-efficient SBM model and the VIKOR model to measure the efficiency of high-quality development of forestry and evaluate its development preference, opportunity cost and benefit ratio, and the conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) There are obvious regional differences in the efficiency of high-quality development of China's forestry in the period of 2012 to 2020, and the overall situation shows that the efficiency of high-quality development in the south is high and the north is low. (1) There are obvious regional differences in China's forestry high-quality development efficiency from 2012 to 2020, and the overall situation is characterized by regional differences of "high in the south and low in the north". The change in the average value of overall efficiency shows a stable wave-like upward trend. (2) From 2012 to 2020, there will be obvious regional differences in China's forestry high-quality development preference, and the overall situation will be characterized by regional differences of "high in the south and low in the north". (3) There is no obvious regional difference in the opportunity cost of high-quality forestry development in China from 2012 to 2020. (4) From 2012 to 2020, the benefit ratio of China's high quality forestry shows that the benefit ratio of the southern forest area is better than that of the other three major forest areas, and the overall difference in the benefit ratio of the other three major forest areas is not significant.
"four reservoirs" concept; forestry high-quality development efficiency; development preference; opportunity cost; benefit ratio
Xinbin Fu, Xueyuan Li, Xintian Xiu. Measuring and Evaluating the Efficiency of China’s Interprovincial High-Quality Forestry Development under the Concept of "Four Pools". The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 11: 21-26. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.061104.
[1] Saisai Wen, Jun Guan, Yue Yang. Construction of Evaluation Index System and Measurement of High Quality Development of Forestry in China[J]. Forestry economic issues,2022,42(03):241-252.
[2] Lyu Jinwei, LIU Bing. Study on the Path of High-quality Development of Forestry Carbon Sinks under the “Dual Carbon” Goal[J]. Forestry economic issues,2022,42(06):666-672.
[3] Xianyu Luo, Dengliang Huang, Yixiao Wang. On the "Four Treasures" of Forests: Theoretical Framework, Scientific Connotation, and Practical Path [J]. Southeast Academic,2023(04):81-91.
[4] RJOUB H, IFEDIORA C U, ODUGBESAN J A, et al. Implications of governance, natural resources, and security threats on economic development: Evidence from Sub-saharan Africa[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(12):6236.
[5] Youliang Ning. Achieving Five Major Transformations and Promoting High Quality Development of Forestry and Grassland Industry [N]. China Natural Resources News.2019-12-12(3).
[6] Qi Zhang, Zhifang Wan. Research on the System Dynamic Mechanism of High Quality Development of Forestry Industry [J]. Forestry Economic Issues, 2021,41(06):607-613.
[7] Haiqing Chang, Lei Yu, Wenjun Tang et al. Research on the High Quality Development Path of Yunnan Forestry Industry [J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Social Sciences), 2023, 7(02): 105-110.
[8] Xiaoyu Chen, Zhijie Guan. Measurement of High Quality Development Level of Forestry in China and Analysis of Regional Differences [J]. Chinese Forestry Economy,2022(01):7-11.
[9] Jinwei Lv, Liu Bing. Research on the Path of High Quality Development of Forestry Carbon Sequestration under the "Dual Carbon" Goal [J]. Forestry Economic Issues,2022,42(06):666-672.
[10] Qian Huang. Research on the High Quality Development Path of Guangxi Forestry Industry [J]. Guangxi Forestry Science,2022,51(01):112-118.
[11] Youliang Ning, Weihang Shen, Chao Song et al. Research on the Promotion Strategy of High quality Development of Forestry Industry [J]. Agricultural Economic Issues,2021(02):117-122.
[12] Yu Bei, Wenxuan Song, Ruixi Gu. Research on the High Quality Development Strategy of China's Forestry Industry [J]. China Forestry Economy,2023(01):88-91.
[13] Hongge Zhu, Jinyuan He, Zhe Ning. Research on Countermeasures for High quality Development of Forestry in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Agricultural Economy,2022(03):39-41.