The disposal awareness of third-party payment platforms is crucial in the legal classification of property offenses under digital payment models. The theoretical debate centers on whether these platforms can be deceived. The introduction of the theory of presumed consent challenges the traditional notion and reshapes the understanding of their authority in asset management, laying a foundation for recognizing their disposal awareness. Acknowledging that these platforms possess independent disposal awareness aligns with the operational logic of online payment systems, satisfies fraud offense criteria, and is consistent with legislative intent.

Liu Shuzhen. The Justification and Recognition of the Disposal Awareness of Third-Party Payment Platforms under the Theory of Presumed Consent. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 11: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.061101.

[1] Liu Xianquan, Lin Yujia. (2017). Property Crimes Involving Third-Party Payment Methods Should Constitute Credit Card Fraud. Procuratorial Daily, December 8.

[2] Jiang Tao. (2019). Constructive Disposal in Cyber Fraud Crimes. Peking University Law Journal, no. 3, pp. 692-712.

[3] Yu Yueyang. (2022). Criminal Determination of Fraud in Online Payments: Based on the Theory of Presumed Consent. Journal of Hebei Vocational College of Public Security Police, no. 1, pp. 58-61.

[4] Li Yingchun. (2017). Criminal Law Classification of Property Crimes in the Context of Third-Party Payments. Application of Law (Judicial Cases), no. 22, pp. 86-92. 

[5] Wang Gang. (2016). German Case Law on Criminal Law: Specific Provisions. Beijing: Peking University Press, p. 201.

[6] Zhou Guangquan. (2016). Criminal Law: Specific Provisions. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, p. 126.