The research on the evaluation of rural landscape quality has emerged as countries in the world protect their rural landscapes in the process of urbanization. Its appearance provides a reference for the planning and design of rural landscapes, and also plays an active role in the protection and development of rural landscapes. This article aims to study the construction of traditional village landscape quality evaluation index system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Based on the analysis of the traditional village landscape system, the method of landscape quality evaluation, the application of the Internet of Things technology in the traditional village landscape informatization, and the principle of constructing the evaluation index system, the traditional village landscape quality evaluation index system was constructed. Take traditional villages in Wuyi area of Jiangmen City as an example, the traditional village landscape quality evaluation index system was applied in practice by taking a questionnaire survey to professionals. The results show that, as far as the landscape quality of traditional villages is concerned, experts believe that village layout and site selection is the most important factor, and traditional architecture and intangible culture are of similar importance.

Liping Ouyang, Zhirui Huang, Ying Bai, Enen Chen, Zufan Chen, Pei Cai. Construction of Traditional Village Landscape Quality Evaluation Index System Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2024) Vol.8, Issue 5: 60-69. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.2024.080510.

[1] Meng B, Chi G. Evaluation Index System Of Green Industry Based On Maximum Information Content[J]. Singapore Economic Review, 2018, 63(2): 174.

[2] Hong Fang. Discussion on the Performance Evaluation Index System of Basic Course Teaching Team in Colleges and Universities[J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2020, 12(03): 76-78.

[3] Chen S, Lei J. Urban arterial road landscape evaluation concerning dynamic variation of road service quality impact factors[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14(13): 1-9.

[4] Ming Wei, et al. Index system and method for the evaluation of highway ecological landscape quality: A case study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, China [J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4128-4134.

[5] He L, Dong M. Learning IoT in Edge: Deep Learning for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing [J]. IEEE Network, 2018, 32(1): 96-101.

[6] Mandal M, Chatterjee N D. Forest landscape and its ecological quality: A stepwise spatiotemporal evaluation through patch-matrix model in Jhargram District, West Bengal State,India[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2021, 2(2): 164-176.

[7] Fedyń I, Figarski T, Kajtoch U. Overview of the impact of forest habitats quality and landscape disturbances on the ecology and conservation of dormice species[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 140(3): 1-16.

[8] Qiu J. Effects of Landscape Pattern on Pollination, Pest Control, Water Quality, Flood Regulation, and Cultural Ecosystem Services: a Literature Review and Future Research Prospects[J]. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2019, 4(4): 113-124.

[9] Gong J, Xie Y, Cao E, et al. Integration of InVEST-habitat quality model with landscape pattern indexes to assess mountain plant biodiversity change: A case study of Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(7): 1193-1210.

[10] Ruan X, Huang J, Williams D, et al. High spatial resolution landscape indicators show promise in explaining water quality in urban streams[J]. Ecological indicators, 2019, 103(AUG.):321-330.

[11] Hayhurst C. The Quest for Quality: Navigating the Changing Landscape of Healthcare Technology Regulations [J]. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 2018, 52(3): 182-191. 

[12] Xie Y, Yu X, et al. Exploring the dynamic correlation of landscape composition and habitat fragmentation with surface water quality in the Shenzhen river and deep bay cross-border watershed, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 90(6): 231-246.

[13] Yu D, Kou G, Xu Z, et al. Analysis of collaboration evolution in AHP research: 1982–2018[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2021, 20(01): 7-36.

[14] Coffey L, Claudio D. In defense of group fuzzy AHP: A comparison of group fuzzy AHP and group AHP with confidence intervals[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 178: 114970.

[15] Zhu Z, Wu Y, Han J. A prediction method of coal burst based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 9: 834958.

[16] Qin G, Zhang M, Yan Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: A case in China[J]. Energy, 2021, 228: 120569.

[17] Wu X, Hu F. Analysis of ecological carrying capacity using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Ecological indicators, 2020, 113: 106243.

[18] Haque M, Ahmad T, Imran M. Review of Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2018, 72(2): 1077-1104.

[19] Smith Risser. Dynamic Analysis of Landscape Pattern in Natural Environment Protection Areas Based on GIS[J]. Nature Environmental Protection, 2021, 2(3): 21-30.