Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Sport Research, 2024, 6(6); doi: 10.25236/FSR.2024.060613.

Research on the Current Status and Development Strategies of College Baseball and Softball Sports

Author(s)

Jun Wu

Corresponding Author:
Jun Wu
Affiliation(s)

Xianda College of Economics and Humanities, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Globally, baseball and softball sports are widely loved for their entertainment and fun aspects. These sports not only provide physical exercise but also foster a sense of cooperation among people. Contemporary college students are keen to delve into and personally experience foreign sports cultures and healthy exercise methods. Despite a history of over a hundred years, the development of baseball and softball in China has been slow due to political, economic, and cultural factors, resulting in relatively poor athletic capabilities and levels of play. Thus, incorporating baseball and softball into physical education in Chinese universities can enrich the curriculum and provide students with diverse exercise options and competitive platforms, enhancing their overall quality and competitive skills. Although there are still many challenges in the development of baseball and softball at Chinese universities at this stage, a thorough analysis of the current status and developmental strategies can lead to targeted solutions, offering valuable references for the widespread promotion and popularization of these sports in Chinese universities.

Keywords

Baseball and softball sports, Development strategies, Innovative strategies

Cite This Paper

Jun Wu. Research on the Current Status and Development Strategies of College Baseball and Softball Sports. Frontiers in Sport Research (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 6: 81-85. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2024.060613.

References

[1] Kroshus, E. (2016). Variability in institutional screening practices related to collegiate student athlete mental health. Journal of Athletic Training, 51(5), 389–397. https://doi.org/10. 4085/1062- 6050-51.5.07

[2] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

[3] Stokowski, S., Fridley, A., Croft, C., Stensland, P., & Arthur-Banning, S. (2022). Athlete identity and mental health among NCAA Division III student-athletes. Journal of Athlete Development and Experience, 4(1), 71–82. 

[4] Moreland, J. J., Coxe, K. A., & Yang, J. (2018). Collegiate athletes’ mental health services utilization: A systematic review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, facilitators, and barriers. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 7(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2017.04.009

[5] NCAA. (2016, January 14). Third GOALS survey findings unveiled. https://www.ncaa.org/news/ 2016/1/14/third-goals-survey-findings-unveiled.aspx

[6] Mignano, A. C., Brewer, B. W., Winter, C. R., & Van Raalte, J. L. (2006). Athletic identity and student involvement of female athletes at NCAA Division III women’s and coeducational colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0050

[7] Valster, K. M. (2020). Mental health screening and help-seeking behavior in NCAA Division III athletics (Publication No. 28155595) [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University Chicago]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

[8] Hwang, S., & Choi, Y. (2016). Data mining in the exploration of stressors among NCAA student athletes. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116674776

[9] Moore, M. A. (2016). Do psychosocial services make the starting lineup? Providing services to student-athletes. Journal of Amateur Sport, 2(2), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v0i0.5046

[10] Livengood, T., Hilliard, J., Martin, K., Darvin, L., & Sagas, M. (2015). What is athlete development literacy? Laboratory for Athlete & Athletics Development & Research, University of Florida. 

[11] Sudano, L. E., Collins, G., & Miles, C. M. (2017). Reducing barriers to mental health care for student-athletes: An integrated care model. Families, Systems, & Health, 35(1), 77–84.