International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2025, 7(2); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2025.070210.
Si Dingnan
Taiwan Cheng Kung University, Nr. 1 University Road, Tainan City, 701, Taiwan, China
FOB contracts have approximately two hundred years of history, but the definition has experienced transformations in accordance with changes of transportation. In an era of harsh economic competition controlling costs means to some extent an increase in profits. In import-export the most significant costs occur in the shipping process. In order to figure out how to reduce shipping costs it is necessary to be aware of the fact that FOB contracts occupy an important position in international trade. Before assessing the costs involved in the shipping process under FOB contracts, the definition and the types of FOB contracts must be presented. The costs are determined by the allocation of obligations. Shipping costs are borne by both seller and buyer, but a number of external elements determine the degree of the costs. Although the parties involved in a sale contract cannot change those elements, they still can reduce the costs by making contractual terms more accurate and precise.
FOB contracts; Cost reduction; Allocation of obligations
Si Dingnan. How to reduce shipping costs under FOB contract: allocation of obligations. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 2: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070210.
[1] Carr, I. & Stone, P. (2005). International trade law (3rd ed.). London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.
[2] Bridge, M. (2007). The International Sale of Goods: Law and Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
[3] International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Bills of Lading. (1924). Brussels (August 25).
[4] Hamid, A. H. (n.d.). (1978)“Whither Malaysia: The Hague - Visby or Hamburg Rules?” Journal of the Malaysian Bar, 33, 83 - 103.
[5] United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea. (1978). United Nations, New York.
[6] Pyrene Co. Ltd. v. Scindia Navigation Co. Ltd. [1954] 2 Q.B. 198.
[7] Wimble Sons & Co v Rosenberg & Sons [1913] 3 KB 743.
[8] Kouladis, N. (2006). Principles of Law Relating to International Trade. New York: Springer.
[9] Bradgate, R. & White, F. (2007). Commercial Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
[10]] D’Arcy, L., Murray, C. & Cleave, B. (2000). Schmitthoff’s Export Trade: The Law and Practice of International Trade. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
[11] Agricultores Federatos Argentinos v Ampro [1956] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 157.
[12] Case Comments (1990). “FOB Contracts: Substitution of Vessels. Cargill UK Ltd v Continental UK Ltd.” Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 4, 466 - 472.
[13] Micco, A. & Pérez, N. (2001). “Maritime Transport Costs and Port Efficiency”. Inter - American Development Bank.
[14] Clark, X., Dollar, D. & Micco, A. (2004). “Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs and Bilateral Trade”. NBER Working Paper 10353.
[15] Lean Enterprise Institute. (2009). “What Is Lean?” Lean Enterprise Institute.
[16] Cooper, R. & Slagmulder, R. (1999). Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise: Interorganizational Cost Management. Montvale: The IMA Foundation for Applied Research, Inc.
[17] Seuring, S. (2002). “Supply Chain Costing – A Conceptual Framework”. In S. Seuring & M. Goldbach (Eds.), Cost Management in Supply Chains (pp. 305). New York: Physica - Verlag Heidelberg.
[18] Institute of Management and Administration. (2006). Cost Reduction and Control: Best Practices (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.