Physical education at the tertiary level plays a crucial role in fostering students' physical and psychological well-being while instilling a lifelong commitment to athletic engagement. However, the prevailing curriculum framework in higher education institutions is often characterized by monotonous content, rigid instructional methodologies, and a lack of individualized training approaches, making it challenging to address the diverse needs of students in physical education. Consequently, establishing a multifaceted and dynamic curriculum system has emerged as a key initiative for enhancing the overall quality of physical education. This study examines the existing structure and limitations of the current college physical education curriculum, explores strategies for developing a diversified system through curriculum content refinement, pedagogical innovation, and assessment system transformation, and evaluates its effectiveness through practical applications. Findings indicate that an enriched and varied curriculum structure significantly boosts students’ engagement and enthusiasm in physical education, contributing to their holistic athletic development. The insights presented in this research offer both a conceptual foundation and an applied reference for advancing curricular reforms in higher education physical education, thereby playing a pivotal role in fostering innovation and progress within the field.

Hairong Ding. Construction and Practical Exploration of Diversified Curriculum System in Physical Education Teaching in Colleges and Universities. Frontiers in Sport Research(2025), Vol. 7, Issue 2: 6-12. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2025.070202.

[1] Sum R K W , Dimmock C .The career trajectory of physical education teachers in Hong Kong[J]. European Physical Education Review, 2013, 19(1):62-75.DOI:10.1177/1356336X12465509.

[2] Patrícia Coutinho, Ramos A ,António M Fonseca,et al.The nature of formative physical activities and sports in the development of senior volleyball players:[J].International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2021, 16(3):731-740.DOI:10.1177/1747954121992040.

[3] Lai C , Huang Y X , Lam T .Teachers' socio-spatial practice in innovative learning environments[J]. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2020, 50(1):1-18.DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1736003.

[4] McCubbin,Jeffrey,A,et al.Preparation of Leadership Personnel in Adapted Physical Education: A Follow-Up Study.[J]. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2000, 17(4):371-380. DOI:10.2165/00007256-200030050-00005.

[5] Korzeniowska-Kubacka I, Bilińska M, Piotrowska D, et al. The impact of exercise-only-based rehabilitation on depression and anxiety in patients after myocardial infarction[J]. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2017, 16(5): 390-396.

[6] Chen Y .Research on college physical education model based on virtual crowd simulation and digital media[J].Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 40(6):1-13.DOI:10.3233/JIFS-189547.

[7] Keele L, Titiunik R. Natural experiments based on geography[J]. Political Science Research and Methods, 2016, 4(1): 65-95.

[8] Han Q .Using neural network for the evaluation of physical education teaching in colleges and universities[J].Soft Computing, 2022, 26(20):10699-10705.DOI:10.1007/s00500-022-06848-9.

[9] Tannehill D , Zakrajsek D .What's Happening in Supervision of Student Teachers in Secondary Physical Education[J].Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2010, 8(1):1-12. DOI:10.1123/jtpe.8.1.1.

[10] Da-Wei C , Chao L , Shun W ,et al.Research and application of multimedia digital platform in the teaching of college physical education course[J].Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(2):893-901.DOI:10.3233/JIFS-169383.