Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2025, 7(3); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2025.070302.

Dispute Resolution Paradigm for Intangible Cultural Heritage and Its Cultural Interpretation under Intellectual Property Framework

Author(s)

Fangjie He

Corresponding Author:
Fangjie He
Affiliation(s)

School of Law and Sociology, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Intellectual Property remains pivotal in safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH). While China's ICH-safeguarding has established legal frameworks, trademark and copyright infringements persist in commercialization, necessitating urgent coordinated public-private legal protection. Chaozhou City, a cultural hub in Lingnan, pioneers pre-litigation mediation paradigms to resolve IP disputes. Case studies of its mediation center in Chao'an District demonstrate institutional enhancements for ICH-safeguarding, though challenges persist: limited mediation scope, insufficient application scenarios, and difficulties in cross-regional infringement identification. The interaction between ritual norms ("Li") and folk customs ("Su") within local traditions further informs this exploration. Concluding reflections address folkloristic perspectives on optimizing ICH-safeguarding paradigms.

Keywords

Intangible Cultural Heritage; Intellectual Property Rights; Pre-litigation Mediation; Legal Folklore Studies

Cite This Paper

Fangjie He. Dispute Resolution Paradigm for Intangible Cultural Heritage and Its Cultural Interpretation under Intellectual Property Framework. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology(2025), Vol. 7, Issue 3: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070302.

References

[1] Shi Aidong. Inner Contradictions of “Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage” and “Protection of Folk Literary and Artistic Works” [J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2018, 32(01): 2-11.

[2] Dong Xinzhong. Research on Private Rights Protection Theory and Practice of Intangible Cultural Heritage [M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2010 Edition.

[3] Lu Chunxiao. Study on the Transfer and Evolution of Intangible Cultural Heritage Rights [J]. Folklore Studies, 2023(05): 120-130+160. DOI: 10.13370/j.cnki.fs.2023.05.009.

[4] Valdimar Hafstein, Juwen Zhang. The Flight of the Condor:Making Intangible Cultural Heritage [J]. Cultural Heritage, 2018,(05):79-83. 

[5] BAMO Qubumo. Intangible Cultural Heritage: From Concept to Practice [J]. National Arts, 2008,(01):6-17. DOI: 10.16564/j.cnki.1003-2568.2008.01.012.

[6] Chao Gejin. The Construction of the Belt and Road Discourse System and the Safeguarding of the Cultural Heritage [J]. North West Ethno-national Studies, 2017,(03):5-16. DOI: 10.16486/j.cnki.62-1035/d.2017.03.001.

[7] Supreme People's Court Supreme People's Procuratorate Guiding Cases [M]. Beijing: People's Court Publishing House, 2018, pp. 136-140, 184-187, 267-271.

[8] Nie Xin. Research on Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Its Boundaries [J]. Cultural Heritage, 2023,(03):24-33.

[9] Jiangsu People's Procuratorate Website: "Zhenhu Embroidery" Intellectual Property Rights Protection Administrative Public Interest Litigation Case [EB/OL]. http://www.jsjc.gov.cn/zdzl/rx zgjzdaldxal/202411/t20241129_1681140.shtml 

[10] Chen Sice, Su Zhihong. Chaoshan District Court Builds a "Litigation-Free ICH" Brand to Promote ICH Development [J]. China Trial, 2023(8):105-105.

[11] Deng Yao. ICH Law Observation: "Digitalization + Intellectual Property Rights" Brightens the ICH Brand, Enriches Young Yingge Dance "A Branch of Red Apricot Blossoms Beyond the Wall" [EB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/wDTEzY15hlIIMqpHiCsrFw

[12] Zhang Shishan. Interaction between Rituals and Customs and Chinese Social Research [J].Folklore Studies, 2016,(06):14-24+157. DOI: 10.13370/j.cnki.fs.2016.06.003.

[13] Meng Lingfa. The Construction of the Belt and Road Discourse System and the Safeguarding of the Cultural Heritage [J]. Journal of Gannan Normal University, 2021, 42(05):55-62. DOI: 10.13698/j.cnki.cn36-1346/c.2021.05.009.