Academic Journal of Agriculture & Life Sciences, 2025, 6(1); doi: 10.25236/AJALS.2025.060109.
Yongquan Wang1, Min Liu2
1State Grid Tai'an Power Supply Company, Tai’an, China
2Tourism College, Taishan University, Tai’an, China
As a clean and renewable energy source, solar energy plays a significant role in achieving the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. The agrivoltaic complementary power station is a relatively popular photovoltaic utilization method nowadays, but there are relatively few studies on its ecological benefits. Therefore, this project takes the Xintai Agro-Photovoltaic Complementary Power Station as the research object, constructs an ecological benefit evaluation model of the agro-photovoltaic complementary power station, and conducts value calculation for its ecological products. The research results show that the agricultural photovoltaic complementary model effectively improves the production and utilization efficiency, bringing high ecological and economic benefits. This study provides a new idea for the coordinated development of photovoltaic resource development and ecological product value, and at the same time provides a scientific basis for the healthy and sustainable development of the photovoltaic industry.
Agricultural and Photovoltaic Complementarity, Ecological Benefits, Carbon Neutrality and Carbon Peaking, Photovoltaic Power Stations
Yongquan Wang, Min Liu. Ecological Product Value Calculation of "Agriculture + New Energy" Projects under the "Dual Carbon" Goals. Academic Journal of Agriculture & Life Sciences (2025), Vol. 6, Issue 1: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJALS.2025.060109.
[1] Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future [J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7411): 294-303.
[2] Sliz-Szkliniarz B. Assessment of the renewable energy-mix and land use trade-off at a regional level: A case study for the Kujawsko–Pomorskie Voivodship [J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 35(1): 257-270.
[3] Kannan N, Vakeesan D. Solar energy for future world: - A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 62: 1092-1105.
[4] Al Irsyad M I, Halog A, Nepal R. Renewable energy projections for climate change mitigation: An analysis of uncertainty and errors [J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 130: 536-546.
[5] El Chaar L, Lamont L A, El Zein N. Review of photovoltaic technologies [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15: 2165-2175.
[6] Blankenship R E, Tiede D M, Barber J, et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement [J]. Science, 2011, 332(6031): 805-809.