International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2025, 7(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2025.070403.
Tian Chunyu, Zhao Dezhu
School of Politics and Law, University of Jinan, Jinan, China
The 2019 case in Yulin, Shaanxi Province, which was fined 66,000 yuan for selling five jin of celery, has drawn great attention and sparked heated discussions after the intervention of The State Council inspection team and the coverage by CCTV. On the one hand, it is the legal legitimacy of administrative decisions and enforcement based on laws and regulations; on the other hand, it is the irritability reflected by the huge disparity between meager profits and high fines. The two are the essence of the public controversy. Such cases of "minor offenses and heavy penalties" not only expose food safety issues, but also highlight problems in administrative legislation and law enforcement, whose root causes mainly lie in two aspects: one is the imperfection of administrative legislation, and the other is the "mechanical administration" phenomenon manifested on the surface of law enforcement and the problems reflected in the ability of administrative personnel. The relevant provisions of the Administrative penalty law should be further refined to enhance the ability of administrative personnel to exercise discretionary power and comprehensively apply administrative legal norms, so as to better balance the rationality and legality of administrative legislation and law enforcement.
Administrative Law Enforcement; Administrative Penalties; Proportionality between Offense and Punishment; Reasonable Administration
Tian Chunyu, Zhao Dezhu. Exploration of the Optimization Path for Administrative Legislation and Administrative Law Enforcement— Taking the Celery Case of Luo in Yulin, Shaanxi Province as a Starting Point. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 4: 14-20. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070403.
[1] Shen Zihua, Chen Zihan. On discretionary mitigation of Administrative penalties - taking 50 samples as an example [J].Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition),24(03):6-12.
[2] Li Qing. On Discretionary mitigation of Administrative penalties - an exploration of the Adjustment Plan for Excessive Penalties [J].Chinese Legal Review,2022(05):194-206.
[3] Chen Taiqing. Judicial application of the principle of proportionality between offense and punishment [J].Law,2021(10):48-63.
[4] Meng Rong. Reflection on the enforcement logic of High Fines in Minor Administrative cases [J].Law,2024(06):29-42.
[5] Li Long, Du Xiaocheng. On Humanized Law enforcement [J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition),2004(5):62-64.
[6] The Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Reading Materials of the Series of Important Speeches by General Secretary [M].Beijing: People's Publishing House.
[7] Yuan Zhoubin, Jia Xinyu. On the path to Greater Acceptability of Administrative Legal norms: Thoughts based on the "Celery Case" in Yulin, Shaanxi Province [J].Journal of Hubei Police Institute,2023(2):150-160.
[8] Zhang Xinyang. Research on Food Safety Supervision and enforcement issues - taking the Yulin Celery Case as an Entry point [J].Modern Trade and Industry.2024(1):143-145.
[9] Yao Jianzong. Conceptual Analysis of common legal knowledge [J].Legal System and Social Development,2021(6):21.
[10] Editorial writer of Guangming Online. Fined 66,000 yuan for selling 5 jin of celery, administrative penalties should prevent arbitrary enforcement [EB\OL] Guangming Net.
[11] Guo Zheping. Legal analysis of issues related to the Chlorpyrifos Excess Celery case [EB\OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzIxNjU2MTg4OA==&mid=2247488302&idx=2&sn=618d72eb7667a4f7b114920fdd2e06e5&chksm=978672a1a0f1fbb71ae04b0076e9f88610cf048891266c438d0e261f855833346af84443f0de&scene=27.