Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2025, 7(7); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2025.070708.

Research on the Impact of Supply Chain Concentration on Corporate ESG Rating Divergence

Author(s)

Yanling Cai1, Yanqiu Zhang1

Corresponding Author:
Yanqiu Zhang
Affiliation(s)

1School of Management, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China

Abstract

This study selects A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2023 as the research sample to investigate the impact of supply chain concentration on corporate ESG rating divergence. The study finds that supply chain concentration has a significantly positive correlation with corporate ESG rating divergence. Supply chain concentration further influences ESG rating divergence by affecting information transparency, verifying the mediating role of information transparency. Behavior related to analysts' earnings forecasts plays a negative moderating role between supply chain concentration and ESG rating divergence. Heterogeneity tests reveal that the positive impact of supply chain concentration on ESG rating divergence is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises.

Keywords

Supply Chain Concentration, Information Transparency, Analyst Earnings Forecast Behavior, Corporate ESG Rating Divergence

Cite This Paper

Yanling Cai, Yanqiu Zhang. Research on the Impact of Supply Chain Concentration on Corporate ESG Rating Divergence. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 7: 56-63. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2025.070708.

References

[1] Huang, Q., & Song, Y. (2019). An Empirical Study on the Impact of Supply Chain Concentration on Enterprise R&D Investment Intensity: The Moderating Role of Ownership Nature. Research and Development Management, 31(3), 13–26.

[2] Zhang, B., Liu, Z., Zhou, J., et al. (2024). Analysis of the impact of supply chain concentration on ESG performance of Chinese listed companies: Based on the perspective of enterprise operation. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 44(6), 1795–1814.

[3] Zhang, N., & Wang, S. (2025). Supply chain concentration and enterprise new quality productivity. Enterprise Economy, (5), 38–49. Retrieved May 19, 2025. 

[4] Guo, X., Fu, D., & Li, K. (2024). How does supply chain concentration affect digital enterprises' R&D investment? The moderating role of market competitive position. Industrial Economic Review, 15(3), 5–20.

[5] Wen, W., Ke, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Customer concentration and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100755. 

[6] Xu, X., Quan, X., & Zhu, S. (2022). Supply chain concentration and enterprise innovation: An empirical study based on China's listed manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Economics, (4), 5–16. 

[7] Han, Y., Hu, J., & Yu, X. (2024). Corporate digital transformation and ESG rating divergence. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, (7), 59–69.

[8] Dong, Y., Zhan, J., & Peng, Y. (2025). Impact of executives' green cognition on ESG rating divergence. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, (3), 101–110.

[9] Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Supply chain digitalization and ESG rating divergence: From the perspective of digital empowerment. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 43(11), 124–133.

[10] Sun, Q., & Yin, M. (2024). Can improving internal control quality reduce corporate ESG rating divergence? Scientific Decision Making, (10), 16–34.

[11] Song, X., Li, S., & Wang, X. (2023). Does ESG report assurance reduce ESG rating divergence? — Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Financial Research, (6), 40–51.

[12] Zhao, J., Lin, Z., & Zhang, C. (2024). Readability of ESG reports and ESG rating divergence. Securities Market Herald, (12), 68–77.

[13] Kuai, Y., Guo, M., & Pan, Y. (2024). Corporate social responsibility rating divergence and analyst earnings forecast behavior. Finance and Economics, (1), 47–62.

[14] Avramov D, Cheng S, Lioui A, et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty[J]. Journal of Financial Eco-nomics, 2022, 145(2): 642-664.

[15] Hutton A. P., A. J. Marcus and H. Tehranian, 2009,“Opaque Financial Reports, R², and Crash Risk ,”Journal Financial Economics, 94, pp.67 ~86.

[16] Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Wu, L. (2009). Information transparency, institutional investors, and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Research, (12), 162–174.

[17] Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2012). Impact of earnings forecast information on analyst forecast behavior. Journal of Financial Research, (6), 193–206.

[18] Ma, Y., & Chen, W. (2024). Can minority shareholder activism improve analyst earnings forecast 

[19] Asante-Appiah B, Lambert T A. 2022.The Role of the External Auditor in Managing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reputation Risk.Review of Accounting Studies, 1-53.