We study the impact of carbon trading pilot policy on the value of manufacturing firms in China. Based on the data of manufacturing listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2008 to 2019, a double-difference empirical study was conducted to investigate the impact of the carbon trading pilot policy on the value of enterprises. It is found that the carbon trading pilot policy is significantly positively related to enterprise value, and this conclusion still holds significantly after a series of robustness tests such as the balanced trend test, the placebo test, and the PSM test. The analysis of the mechanism of action shows that green innovation has a mediating role in the process of enhancing enterprise value by the carbon trading pilot policy, and the green innovation activities of enterprises can strengthen the positive impact of this policy on enterprise value creation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that when enterprises meet the conditions of non-state ownership, low pollution and low environmental regulation, the carbon trading pilot policy has a more significant effect on the value enhancement of manufacturing enterprises.

Jiangfeng Chao, Xue Li. Can Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Affect the Value of China’s Manufacturing Firms? --Empirical Evidence from China's Manufacturing Sector from 2008 to 2019. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 7: 149-158. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2025.070720.

[1] Zhang W J, Zhang N, Yu Y N. Carbon Mitigation Effects and Potential Cost Savings from Carbon Emissions Trading in China's Regional Industry[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2019, 114: 1-11.

[2] Ye D, Liu S, Kong D. Do efforts on energy saving enhance firm values? Evidence from China's stock market[J]. Energy Economics, 2013, 40: 360-369.

[3] Chapple L, Clarkson P M, Gold D L. The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme ( ETS )[J]. Abacus, 2013, 49(1): 1-33.

[4] Wen F, Zhao L, He S, et al. Asymmetric relationship between carbon emission trading market and stock market:evidences from China[J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 91: 104850.

[5] Clarkson P M, Li Y, Pinnuck M, et al. The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. European Accounting Review, 2015, 24(3): 551-580.

[6] Oestreich A M, Tsiakas I. Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015, 58: 294-308.

[7] Yan G H, Shi H L. A Study on the Impact of Pilot Carbon Emission Trading Policies on Corporate Performance[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(5): 2214.

[8] Ge W F, Xu Y, Razzaq A, et al. What drives the green transformation of enterprises? A case of carbon emissions trading pilot policy in China[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023, 30(19): 56743-56758.

[9] Wang Y, Wu W. Does the Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy Enhance Carbon Reduction Efficiency? [J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(11): 5076.

[10] Zhao X, Long L, Sun Q, et al. How to evaluate investment efficiency of environmental pollution control: Evidence from China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(12): 7252.

[11] Du K, Cheng Y, Yao X. Environmental regulation,green technology innovation,and industrial structure upgrading:The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities[J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 98(6): 105247.

[12] Zhou B, Li Y, Sun F C, et al. Executive compensation incentives,risk level and corporate innovation[J]. Emerging Markets Review, 2021, 47: 100798.

[13] Shen F, Liu B, Luo F, et al. The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 292: 112765.

[14] Beck T, Levkov R L. Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States[J]. Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.