Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Architecture and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 7(2); doi: 10.25236/AJAGE.2025.070208.

Exploration of Interactive Activities in Ambiguous Spaces within Tropical Universities: A Case study of Hainan University

Author(s)

Chen Zhenchen

Corresponding Author:
Chen Zhenchen
Affiliation(s)

Gold Mantis School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou, China

Abstract

The study investigates the role of ambiguous spaces in facilitating social interactions within tropical university campuses, using Hainan University as a case study. Drawing on environmental psychology and spatial theory, the research analyzes interactive behaviors—categorized as necessary, optional, and social activities—and examines how individual spatial preferences (peripheral orientation), group spatial dynamics (central clustering), and boundary perception influence behavioral patterns. The study clarifies the theoretical foundation of ambiguous spaces, tracing their origins to postmodern architectural discourse. These spaces are characterized by blurred boundaries and functional hybridity, with three primary typologies: introverted, extroverted, and independent. Their key functions include transitional connectivity, spatial emphasis, interaction stimulation, and functional adaptability. Empirical findings reveal distinct activity patterns among Hainan University students, highlighting a particular shortage of spaces for small-group interactions. Case studies of ambiguous spaces in libraries, teaching buildings, and concert halls demonstrate how vertical spatial sequencing, boundary softening, and functional blending effectively address tropical climatic conditions (high temperatures, strong solar radiation) while accommodating diverse social needs.

Keywords

Ambiguous Space; Tropical University; Social Interaction; Spatial Behavior

Cite This Paper

Chen Zhenchen. Exploration of Interactive Activities in Ambiguous Spaces within Tropical Universities: A Case study of Hainan University. Academic Journal of Architecture and Geotechnical Engineering (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 2: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJAGE.2025.070208.

References

[1] Li L, Fan M J. Historical Development and Contemporary Significance of Ambiguous Space[J]. Art and Design (Theory), 2010, 2(05): 113-115.

[2] Fujimoto, Sou. When Architecture Is Born [M]. Translated by Guangxi Normal University Press, 2013.

[3] Kisho K. Japanese Gray Tone Culture[J]. World Architecture, 1984(Special Issue):6.

[4] Lin S J, Fu Z Q. Analysis of the Influence of Ambiguous Space on Modern Art Museum Spaces[J]. Architecture & Culture, 2022(06):55-57.

[5] Zhi Y J, Liu W. Analysis of Spatial Ambiguity in Contemporary Sports Building Complexes[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2023, 20(03):199-201.

[6] Hu Q M, Jiang C F, Mei Y. Encyclopedia of China[M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2007: 23-26.

[7] Gehl, J. Livet mellem husene, udeaktiviteter og udemiljøer. Danish Architectural Press, 1971.

[8] Feng H M. Analysis and Research on Interactive Spaces Inside University Teaching Buildings Based on Human-Environment Behavior[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2011: 25-30.

[9] Zhou M Z. Research on Museum Space Design Based on Architectural Phenomenology[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2021.