Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2025, 7(7); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2025.070707.

Research on the Application of the “Complex-Simple Case Diversion + Law Interpretation through Cases” Model for the Expedited Handling of Minor Criminal Cases

Author(s)

Junjie Pan

Corresponding Author:
Junjie Pan
Affiliation(s)

Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

At present, the contradiction between the large number of cases and the limited number of judicial personnel has become increasingly prominent in judicial practice. With the growing number of minor criminal cases, the traditional one-size-fits-all trial model can no longer meet the needs of rapidly developing judicial practices. Against this backdrop, exploring a more efficient and socially functional model for handling minor criminal cases is of great significance. Meanwhile, as public demands for efficiency and fairness continue to rise, studying the application of the “complex-simple case diversion + law interpretation through cases” model for the expedited handling of minor criminal cases has become necessary. This paper systematically analyzes the practical challenges of implementing this model and, based on China’s judicial practice and national conditions, explores pathways to optimize its application. The aim is to promote the transformation of the expedited trial model from pilot exploration to theoretical institutionalization, thereby further improving the allocation of judicial resources and advancing the modernization of social governance.

Keywords

Minor Criminal Cases; Complex-Simple Case Diversion; Law Interpretation through Cases; Expedited Case Handling

Cite This Paper

Junjie Pan. Research on the Application of the “Complex-Simple Case Diversion + Law Interpretation through Cases” Model for the Expedited Handling of Minor Criminal Cases. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 7: 44-48. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070707.

References

[1] Liu Ke. Norms of Decriminalization in Judicial Interpretations: Types, Basis, and Directions for Improvement [J]. Chinese Legal Science, 2021(06): 244–263.

[2] Yan Zhaohua. Non-Prosecution for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment: Reflection and Reconstruction of Leniency Pathways in the Procuratorial Stage [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2021(01): 128–146.

[3] Tang Huojian, Hao Tingting, Tao Yanyu. An Empirical Study on the Diversion Effect of Trial Procedures in Plea Cases — An Analysis Based on 3,076 Plea Cases in Basic Courts of City C [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021(03): 56–63.

[4] Li Yong. The Path of “Simplified Procedures” in Plea Cases [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2019(06): 142–156.

[5] Ye Qing, Han Dongcheng. A Study on the Judicial Application Procedures of the Leniency System for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment under the Policy of Misdemeanor Criminal Law [J]. Chinese Criminal Law Review, 2020(05): 94–111.