Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2026, 9(1); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090107.

Dual-Stage Geometric Calibration for Artifact Suppression in Cone-Beam CT

Author(s)

Yulong Zhang1, Zhen Zhang2, Jianqiang Mei1

Corresponding Author:
Zhen Zhang
Affiliation(s)

1School of Electronic Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, 300222, China

2Nanjing Chenguang Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 210006, China

Abstract

To address artifacts and shape deviations in cone-beam CT (CBCT) caused by geometric misalignments, this study proposes a phantom-free two-stage calibration scheme. Detector pre-correction is first performed to lay a foundation for subsequent rotation-axis optimization, with the latter leveraging a Sharpness-Maximized Matching (SMM) strategy as the core. Specifically, detector pre-correction is achieved via symmetry-aware SIFT matching, adaptive sampling, and doubly-weighted optimization to estimate the detector’s horizontal offset. For rotation-axis optimization, an improved evaluation function is introduced under the SMM framework, and the optimal horizontal offset of the rotation axis is determined through iterative reconstruction within a predefined search range. Experiments on a set of industrial workpiece projection data demonstrate that the proposed two-stage scheme effectively eliminates artifacts, outperforms SAM and WAC in both image sharpness and measurement accuracy, and enables high-precision non-destructive testing without relying on dedicated phantoms.

Keywords

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Geometric Calibration, Rotation-Axis Correction, SIFT Feature Matching

Cite This Paper

Yulong Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Jianqiang Mei. Dual-Stage Geometric Calibration for Artifact Suppression in Cone-Beam CT. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 1: 56-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090107.

References

[1] Yu B ,Zhou Z ,Yu J , et al.Low-Temperature Performance of Open-Grade Friction Course Based on Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction Technology[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements,2026,152(1).

[2] HE R ,ZHOU N ,ZHANG K , et al.Progress and challenges towards additive manufacturing of SiC ceramic[J].Journal of Advanced Ceramics,2021,10(04):637-674.

[3] Ge X, Wang L, Garcia L J, et al. 3D microstructure reconstruction of heterogeneous material from slice descriptors using explicit neural network[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2026, 448: 118469.

[4] Kyriakou Y, Meyer E, Prell D, Kachelriess M. Empirical beam hardening correction (EBHC) for CT. Med Phys. 2010 Oct;37(10):5179-87.

[5] Dewulf, W.; Tan, Y.; Kiekens, K. Sense and non-sense of beam hardening correction in CT metrology. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.2012, 61, 495–498.

[6] HsinWu T ,Andrew K ,Srinivasan V .Cone-beam breast CT using an offset detector: effect of detector offset and image reconstruction algorithm.[J].Physics in medicine and biology,2022,67(8).

[7] Azevedo S G, Schneberk D J. Calculation of the rotational centers in computed tomography sinograms[J].IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1990(4):1525-1540.

[8] Donath T, Beckmann F, Schreyer A. Automated determination of the center of rotation in tomography data[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2006, 23(5): 1048-1057.

[9] Liu Tong, Malcolm A A. Comparison between fourmethods for central ray determination with wire phan-toms in micro-computedtomography systems[J].Optical Engineering,2006,45(6):066402. (in chinese).

[10] LIU H, CHEN J B, SONG X P, et al. Method for determining the center of rotation based on statistical average[J]. Journal of Test and Measurement Technology, 2019, 33(6): 498-502.

[11] LV Z T, GUI Z G, LlU Y, et al. Industrial CT rotation center calibration method b-ased on weighted average [J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021,30(5):539-546. (in chinese).

[12] Welkenhuyzen F, Boeckmans B, Tan Y, Kiekens K and Dewulf W. 2014 Investigation of the kinematic system of a 450 kV CT scanner and its influence on dimensional CT metrology applications 5th Conf. on Industrial Computed Tomography (ICT) (Wels, Austria) pp 217–25

[13] LOWE D G .Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints[J].Internation-al Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2):91-110

[14] Hofmann J, Flisch A, Zboray R. Principles for an Implementation of a Complete CT Reconstruction Tool Chain for Arbitrary Sized Data Sets and Its GPU Optimization[J]. Journal of Imaging, 2022, 8(1): 12.

[15] Kingston A, Sakellariou A, Varslot T, Myers G, Sheppard A. Reliable automatic alignment of tomographic projection data by passive auto-focus. Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):4934-45.

[16] Van Aarle W, Palenstijn WJ, Cant J, et al. Fast and flexible X-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox. Opt Express. 2016 Oct 31;24(22):25129-25147.