Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2026, 8(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2026.080104.

ESG Rating Divergence and Annual Report Tone Management: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Author(s)

Zhang Yuan, Wang Yiman

Corresponding Author:
Wang Yiman
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710021, China

Abstract

In the current process of economic and social development, ESG principles are receiving increasing attention, and discrepancies in ratings assigned by different rating agencies to listed companies' ESG performance are becoming increasingly common. Are company management teams manipulating the tone of their annual reports to mitigate the negative impact of ESG rating discrepancies? To investigate this question, this study employs a sample of non-financial listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets in China. Using relevant panel data from 2015 to 2024, it empirically examines the relationship between ESG rating divergence and annual report tone management. Findings reveal a significant positive correlation between ESG rating divergence and annual report tone management, with corporate reputation and investor sentiment partially mediating this relationship. Heterogeneity tests reveal that ESG rating divergence amplifies the extent of annual report tone management more markedly in firms with poorer internal control quality and lower information transparency. These findings enrich the literature on factors influencing annual report tone management, provide robust support for refining ESG rating standards, and offer actionable recommendations for corporate sustainability and investor decision-making.

Keywords

ESG rating divergence, annual report tone management, corporate reputation, investor sentiment

Cite This Paper

Zhang Yuan, Wang Yiman. ESG Rating Divergence and Annual Report Tone Management: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 1: 28-39. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2026.080104.

References

[1] BERG F, KÖLBEL J F, RIGOBON R. Aggregate confusion: the divergence of ESG ratings[J]. Review of Finance, 2022, 26(6): 1315-1344.

[2] Xu Xiangbing, Qiao Pengcheng, Huang Qin. Can ESG Responsibility Performance Convey More Transparent Information? [J]. Industrial Economics Review, 2023, (02): 5-21.

[3] Hao Xiaomin, Wang Yonghai. ESG Rating Divergence and Abnormally Positive Management Tone: A Textual Study Based on Management Discussion and Analysis[J]. Research in Economics and Management, 2024, 45(12): 47-67.

[4] CHRISTENSEN D M, SERAFEIM G, SIKOCHI A. Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings[J]. The Accounting Review, 2022, 97(1): 147-175.

[5] DING Hua, YANG Wenqi. ESG Rating Divergence, Investor Confidence and Stock Price Volatility[J]. Accounting and Finance Bulletin, 2025,(11):61-64.

[6] Jiahua Zhao, Minglin Wang, Saisai Hong, Si Tan. ESG rating divergence and financing constraints: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 389, 2025, 126188.

[7] Tianyi Zhu, Haoqiang Wu, Sujie Hu. ESG rating divergence and corporate financialisation: Towards sustainable development or short-term profitability[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 389, 2025, 126239.

[8] Zeng Qingsheng, Zhou Bo, Zhang Cheng, et al. Annual Report Tone and Insider Trading: "Consistency Between Words and Deeds" or "Hypocrisy"?[J]. Management World, 2018, 34(09):143-160.

[9] Lin Wanfa, Zhao Zhongkuang, Song Min. Tone Manipulation in Management Discussion and Analysis and Its Bond Market Reaction[J]. Management World, 2022, 38(01):164-180.

[10] Ma Yongqiang, Chen Weizhong. Corporate Digital Transformation and Management's Annual Report Tone Management [J]. Accounting Research, 2024, (07): 26-40.

[11] Avramov D, Cheng S, Lioui A, et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 145(2): 642-664.

[12] Zhou, Zejang; Ding, Xiaojuan; Sanzi, Ziyao. ESG Rating Discrepancies and Audit Risk Premium [J]. Audit Research, 2023, (06): 72-83.

[13] Wang, H. J., & Wang, K. M. Research on accrual manipulation and tone manipulation in annual report textual information [J]. Accounting Research, 2018,(04):45–51.

[14] He Taiming, Li Yipu, Wang Zheng, et al. Does ESG Rating Discrepancy Enhance Voluntary Information Disclosure by Listed Companies? [J]. Accounting and Economic Research, 2023, 37(03): 54-70.

[15] Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Mediating Effect Analysis: Methodological and Model Development [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(05):731–745.

[16] Guan Kailei, Zhang Rui. Corporate Reputation and Earnings Management: An Effective Contract Perspective or a Rent-Seeking Perspective [J]. Accounting Research, 2019, (01): 59-64.

[17] Jin Guanghui. Investor Sentiment, Executive Equity Incentives and Corporate Investment: An Empirical Test Based on the Accommodation Channel [J]. Journal of the Central University of Finance and Economics, 2015, (06): 65-74.

[18] Quan Xiaofeng, Wu Shinuo, Yin Hongying. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk: "Value-Enhancing Tool" or "Self-Serving Instrument"? [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(11): 49-64.

[19] Huang Chao, Wang Min. Does Management Employ Annual Report Tone to Facilitate Earnings Management? [J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2019, 41(06): 90-97.