Relationships have been demonstrated between certain leadership styles and civil servant’ voice behavior. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory and Social Exchange Theory, this study constructs a three-dimensional interaction model to explore the mechanism underlying the relationship between transformational leadership and civil servants’ voice behavior. By assessing the research hypotheses using data from 512 Chinese grassroots civil servants, the study uncovers that transformational leadership has a significant positive relationship with civil servants’ voice behavior; self-efficacy positively moderated the relationship; the moderating effect of self-efficacy differed as a function of work tenure, though further validation is needed due to limited effect sizes. These provide valuable insights for government organizational leaders to better use the power of transformational leadership to motivate employees’ voice-raising behaviors.

Jingjing Lin, Qin Wang, Xile Wu. Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Civil Servants’ Voice Behavior: Moderating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Work Tenure. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 1: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2026.080106.

[1] Duan, J. Y., & Wei, Q. J. (2012). The structure of voice efficacy and its role in employee voice behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(7), 972-985.

[2] Duan, J. Y., & Zhang, Q. (2012). Cognitive influencing factors, theoretical foundations, and mechanisms of voice behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(01), 115-126.

[3] Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 183-191.

[4] Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[5] Le Pine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.

[6] Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.

[7] Duan, J. Y. (2011). Research on voice behavior in the Chinese context: Structure, formation mechanisms, and influences. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(02), 185-192. 

[8] Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.

[9] Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial response to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 851-875.

[10] Teng, X. P., & Cheng, D. J. (2019). How do creative teams activate internal intellectual resources? The influence of leadership style and job characteristics on employee voice behavior. Management Modernization, 39(04), 78-81. 

[11] Hsiung, H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349-361.

[12] Chen, A. S., & Hou, Y. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.

[13] Duan, J. Y., Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2016). Meta-analysis of demographic characteristics of employee voice behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(10), 1568-1582. 

[14] Zhao, H. D., Chen, Y. H., & Zheng, W. B. (2019). Perception of socially responsible human resource management and employee voice behavior: Based on social exchange theory. Human Resource Development of China, 36(09), 91-104. 

[15] Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row, 19.

[16] Li, C. P., Tian, B., & Shi, K. (2006). Transformational leadership and employee work attitudes: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Acta Psychologica Sinica, (02), 297-307. 

[17] Chen, Y. X., Jia, L. D., & Li, C. P., et al. (2006). Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and employee organizational commitment: An empirical study in the Chinese context. Management World, (01), 96-105+144. 

[18] Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept-based theory. Organization Science, 4,577-594.

[19] Li, C. P., & Shi, K. (2005). The structure and measurement of transformational leadership. Acta Psychologica Sinica, (06), 97-105. 

[20] Liu, Y. T., & Yu, F. H. (2019). An empirical study on the relationship between transformational leadership, constructive change obligation, and employee voice behavior. Forecasting, 38(05), 29-35. 

[21] Wu, L. Z., Cao, K. P., & Chen, Y. Y., et al. (2011). The impact of transformational leadership behavior on employee voice behavior. Journal of Management Sciences, 8(01), 61-66+80.

[22] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

[23] Zhou, Y., Huang, X., & Xie, W. J. (2020). Will feelings of over qualification stimulate employee voice? Based on the perspective of fairness heuristic. Management Review, 32(12), 192-203. 

[24] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.

[25] Mao, C. G., & Guo, L. (2017). The Motivation for Employee Silence in China: A Study Based on Implicit Theory. Journal of Beijing Normal University. Social Sciences Edition, (04), 134-144. 

[26] Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA Framework: An Update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773.

[27] Super, D. E. (1980). A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3): 282-298.

[28] Duan, J. Y., Zhang, C., & Tian, X. M. (2016). Mechanisms of employee voice behavior: Influence from leadership. Human Resource Development of China, (05), 16-26.

[29] He, R. R., & Cai, D. H. (2019). The influence of bureaucratic culture on proactive voice behavior of civil servants: A chain-mediated model. Leadership Science, (20), 63-66.

[30] Wang, Y. F., Huang, J. X., & Zhu, Y. (2018). A study on the relationship between inclusive leadership and voice behavior based on the perspective of cognitive-emotional integration]. Journal of Management Sciences, 15(09), 1311-1318.

[31] Zhang, L. H., Guo, Y. G., & Liu, R. (2017). Leadership behavior and employee voice in the Chinese context. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 19(02), 81-87. 

[32] Chu, X. P., & Zhong, Y. W. (2015). A study on transformational leadership and employee voice behavior from the perspective of person-organization fit. Southern Economy, (04), 61-75.

[33] Kahn, J., & Byun, S. (2010). Public service motivation and public sector employees’ voice behavior: The moderating role of job embeddedness. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 425-442. 

[34] Li, F. J, & Qi, T. T. (2017). Can employee voice improve job performance? The role of voice adoption and self-efficacy. Chinese Human Resources Development, (08), 71-82.

[35] Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1): 71-92.

[36] Bao, G. M., & Qian, Y. Y. (2009). Employee voice from a multi-perspective research framework. Soft Science, 23(08), 104-106. 

[37] Chen, J., & Shi, K. (2017). A review of employee voice behavior from an integrative perspective. Management Review, 29(09), 215-228.

[38] Deng, J. Z., & Fan, H. (2014). Factors influencing employee voice behavior: A meta-analysis based on individual-level variables. Science and Technology & Economy, 27(03), 81-85.

[39] Liu, S. M., & Liao, J. Q. (2015). Can Chinese employees really be led to voice? The impact of authentic leadership on employee inhibitive voice. Business Economics and Management, (06), 58-68. 

[40] Jia, J. F., Jiao, Y. X., & Yan, J. Q. (2020). Research on the influence mechanism of ethical leadership on employees’ proactive behavior. Journal of Management Sciences, 17(09), 1327-1335. 

[41] Miao, B., Suo, Y. Y., & Liang, Y. J., et al. (2023). The influence of abusive leadership on employee work engagement: The role of subordinate’ s sense of fairness and power distance orientation. Management Review, 35(08), 244-254. 

[42] Duan, J. Y., Xiao, J. Y., & Xia, X. T. (2017). Transformational leadership, team voice climate, and team performance: The moderating role of innovation climate. Science Research Management, 38(04), 76-83.

[43] Jia, M. M., Zhang, L. T., & Wang, Q. (2020). Leadership style and employee voice: A perspective based on mutual trust. Scientific Research Management, 41(03), 238-246. 

[44] Xie, J., Chu, X. P., & Zhong, Y. W. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee voice: The influence of voice efficacy and leader prototypicality. Management Research at Zhongnan University, 10(02), 1-18. 

[45] Blau, P. M. (1968). The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 73(4), 453-467.

[46] Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.

[47] Cropamzano, R., Anthony, E. L., & Daniels, S. R., et al. (2017). Exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1-38.

[48] Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.

[49] Avolio, B. J., Weichun, Z., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Structural Distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 25(8), pp. 951-968.

[50] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. 

[51] Duan, J. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2014). Revisiting the influence mechanism of transformational leadership on employee voice: A perspective of self-determination. Nankai Business Review, 17(04), 98-109. 

[52] Glomb, T. M., Bhave, D. P., & Miner, A. G., et al. (2011). Doing good, feeling good: Examining the role of organizational citizenship behaviors in changing mood. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 191-223.

[53] Sun, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee voice: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Taxation and Economy, (01), 28-33.

[54] Ouyang, C. H., Zhu, Y. Y., & Guo, M. Y. (2022). Dual leadership and the ‘voice paradox’ : A cross-level study. Management Review, 34(08), 229-242. 

[55] Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912.

[56] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 11-18.

[57] Bandura, A. (2011). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.

[58] Su, W. L., & Lin, X. Q. (2019). A dual-path analysis of the impact of developmental feedback from supervisors on employee voice behavior. Based on the perspectives of social exchange theory and social cognitive theory. Economic Perspectives, 36(05), 112-119. 

[59] Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S., & Higgins, C. A. (1998). A self-efficacy theory: Explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4): Article number 10.

[60] Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.

[61] Song, L. L., & Liu, Y. R. (2014). The Influence of Leadership Empowering Behavior on Employee Voice: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust and General Self-Efficacy. Scientific Decision Making, (05), 17-32. 

[62] Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2013). The impact of job insecurity on voice behavior based on the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Management Review, 10(11), 1604-1610.

[63] Wang, N., Zhao, X. P., & Zhou, M., et al. (2014). The influence of leadership style and self-efficacy on individual feedback seeking. Soft Science, 28(05), 37-42.

[64] Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2011). Affective Organizational Commitment and Citizenship Behavior: Linear and Non-Linear Moderating Effects of Organizational Tenure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 528-537.

[65] Liang, R. C., & Ma, S. L. (2021). When does feelings of overqualification trigger proactive behavior among employees? The moderating effects of perceived insider identity and length of tenure. Enterprise Economy, 40(08), 104-116.

[66] Hackman, J. R. (1980). Work Redesign and Motivation. Professional Psychology, 11(3), 445-455.

[67] Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134-143.

[68] Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford University Press, 9,21.

[69] Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

[70] Long, W. L., Chuang, A., & Wong, C. S., et al. (2018). A Typology of Three-Way Interaction Models: Applications and Suggestions for Asian Management Research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1), 1-16.

[71] Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA Framework: An Update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773.