Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2026, 9(4); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090403.
Jiangtao Yin
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 200093, Shanghai, China
This paper studies coordinated routing and charging/discharging scheduling of two mobile energy storage system (MESS) vehicles across three distribution networks (DNs) under load and renewable uncertainty. To avoid equal-weight limitations, a dual-dimension dynamic weighting strategy jointly uses network importance and real-time flexibility deficit. The optimization target is the total weighted system flexibility index (SFI) of the three-DN system, while DN-level SFIs are retained as component indicators for interpretation. SFI is defined by aggregating normalized upward and downward regulation capability of generation, demand response, stationary storage, and MESS over the scheduling horizon. The MESS spatiotemporal flexibility value is quantified by the difference between weighted SFI before and after MESS integration. A deterministic model and a stochastic extension with Monte Carlo scenario generation and forward scenario reduction are developed. In the revised case, 1000 raw uncertainty scenarios are reduced to 50 representative scenarios. Results show that MESS integration increases both expected and worst-case weighted SFI, and dynamic weights automatically shift toward high-deficit periods and critical DNs. Explicit route and state-of-charge trajectories provide implementable operating guidance.
Distribution network flexibility, mobile energy storage, stochastic programming, scenario reduction, coordinated routing and scheduling
Jiangtao Yin. Coordinated Scheduling of Two Mobile Energy Storage Vehicles for Maximizing Weighted SFI in Three Distribution Networks under Uncertainty. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 4: 21-29. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090403.
[1] X. Liu, C. B. Soh, T. Zhao, and P. Wang, “Stochastic Scheduling of Mobile Energy Storage in Coupled Distribution and Transportation Networks for Conversion Capacity Enhancement,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 117–130, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2020.3015338.
[2] J. Dugan and D. B. Richardson, “Application of Mobile Energy Storage for Enhancing Power System Resilience: A Review,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 20, art. 6476, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14206476.
[3] M. M. Elmeligy, M. F. Shaaban, A. Azab, M. A. Azzouz, and M. Mokhtar, “A Mobile Energy Storage Unit Serving Multiple EV Charging Stations,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 10, art. 2969, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14102969.
[4] W. Sun, Y. Qiao, and W. Liu, “Economic scheduling of mobile energy storage in distribution networks based on equivalent reconfiguration method,” Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 32, art. 100879, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2022.100879.
[5] Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Yu, and Z. Wang, “Mobile energy storage systems with spatial–temporal flexibility for post-disaster recovery of power distribution systems: A bilevel optimization approach,” Energy, vol. 282, art. 128300, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128300.
[6] H. M. A. Ahmed, M. E. Elsharkawy, and M. A. Sayed, “Stochastic multi-benefit planning of mobile energy storage in reconfigurable active distribution systems,” Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, art. 101190, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2023.101190.
[7] R. González-Castellanos and D. Pozo, “Improved forward selection method for scenario reduction in stochastic power system planning,” in Proc. 2021 IEEE PowerTech Madrid, 2021, pp. 1–6.
[8] F. Ziel, “The energy distance for ensemble and scenario reduction,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 379, no. 2202, art. 20190431, 2021, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0431.
[9] W. Guo, T. Liu, F. Wang, Y. Wang, and J. Wang, “Optimal Scheduling of Source–Load–Storage Mobile Energy Storage System for Power Distribution Network under Ice Disaster,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 10, art. 3020, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11103020.
[10] X. Liu et al., “Recovery strategy of distribution network based on dynamic island rescue under extreme weather,” IET Energy Systems Integration, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1049/esi2.12140.
[11] S. Zhang, “Optimized scenario reduction approach for stochastic power system planning,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1138584/v1
[12] H. Zhuang, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang, “Problem-driven scenario reduction for large-scale stochastic programming,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07679, 2024.
[13] Y. Jing, A. Jiang, and X. Xue, “Flexibility-Constrained Energy Storage Placement for Improving Distribution Network’s Operational Flexibility,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, art. 9129, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16209129.
[14] T. Wu, H. Zhuang, Q. Huang, S. Xia, Y. Zhou, W. Gan, and J. S. Terzić, “Routing and scheduling of mobile energy storage systems in active distribution network based on probabilistic voltage sensitivity analysis and Hall’s theorem,” Applied Energy, vol. 386, art. 125535, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125535.
[15] K. Zagrajek and J. Paska, “Economic viability of mobile electricity storage facilities serving as an alternative means of electricity sharing by providing time-shifting ancillary service,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 342, art. 120181, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120181.