Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2026, 9(5); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090507.
Zhougeng Lin1, Xinqi Huang2
1School of Management, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China
2School of Business, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
This paper investigates the implementation and effectiveness of AI-assisted case teaching within university logistics education, addressing critical gaps between technological potential and pedagogical practice. Through a comprehensive survey of logistics majors at Shenzhen Polytechnic University, combined with K-means clustering analysis, this research identifies three primary challenges: the predominance of entertainment-focused case selection undermining educational objectives, significant limitations in the timeliness and contextual depth of AI-generated materials, and insufficient inspirational impact on student learning. The clustering analysis further reveals three distinct student profiles, enthusiastic adopters, cautious participants, and resistant traditionalists, highlighting varied receptivity to AI-assisted methodologies. Root cause analysis demonstrates that these issues stem from inherent tensions in case teaching between authenticity and argumentation, divergent teacher competencies in curating and guiding AI-generated content, and widespread lack of student subjective initiative. In response, this paper proposes a structured framework for enhancing teaching effectiveness, emphasizing reality-grounded case design, integration of timely socio-industrial concerns, inclusive participatory mechanisms, and improved inspirational scaffolding. The findings underscore that successful AI integration requires moving beyond technological novelty to foster pedagogical synergy, where AI tools augment rather than replace critical educator roles. This study contributes to the evolving discourse on AI in education by providing empirical evidence and strategic insights for optimizing case-based learning in specialized vocational disciplines.
AI-assisted case study, logistics, K-means clustering
Zhougeng Lin, Xinqi Huang. A Cluster-Based Approach to Optimize AI-Generated Case Study in University Logistics Courses. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2026), Vol. 9, Issue 5: 57-66. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2026.090507.
[1] Garvin, D. A. (2023). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56-65.
[2] Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002.
[3] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27.
[4] Tang, X. (2025). AI and the reshaping of higher education: Goals, content, and models. New Country Renren Education Research Institute.
[5] Zhou, W., & Zhang, D. (2023). The ‘Human-AI Collaboration’ teaching model: Fostering higher-order thinking skills in the smart learning environment. Computers & Education, 180, 104456.
[6] Taylor, S., & White, R. (2023). Overcoming algorithm aversion: Student trust in AI-generated vs. human-written cases. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 301-322.
[7] Kaplan, A. (2024). The four paradoxes of AI in education: Between friend and foe. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 89-105.
[8] Wang, L., & Wang, S. (2024). AI-generated case studies in logistics education: A meta-analysis of student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Logistics Education and Practice, 12(3), 45-60.
[9] McMurray, J. (2024). Moving theory to practice: The role of case competitions in business education. Journal of Management Education, 48(2), 150-165.
[10] Selwyn, N. (2021). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
[11] Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
[12] Kim, D., & Park, H. (2023). Virtual simulations in logistics training: Impact on problem-solving skills and knowledge retention. Computers & Education, 187, 104501.
[13] Gupta, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Ethical challenges of AI in education: Bias, authenticity, and academic rigor. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 88-102.
[14] Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2023). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 52(3), 45-51.
[15] Johnson, J., Kabigting, E., & Gonzalez, K. (2025). Using AI to enhance communication skills in nursing education: An interactive platform for end-of-life care conversations. Journal of Nursing Education, 64(5), 12-19.
[16] Brown, K., & Davis, P. (2025). AI and collaborative learning in logistics: Effects on team problem-solving. Journal of Business Logistics, 46(3), 155-175.
[17] Rodríguez, P., & Kumar, A. (2023). Teacher readiness for AI integration: Training gaps and competency models. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104055.
[18] Zhang, L., & Wu, Y. (2024). Natural language processing for analyzing student reflections in case-based logistics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1020-1038.
[19] UNESCO. (2024). A framework for AI literacy in students. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
[20] Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2025). Adaptive learning systems for logistics curriculum: A framework for personalized case teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(2), 210-230.
[21] Müller, F., & Schmidt, T. (2024). Blockchain and AI for authentic assessment in logistics education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17(3), 450-465.
[22] Alvarez, I., & Santos, R. (2023). Gamified AI simulations for sustainable logistics education: A case of carbon footprint reduction. Sustainability, 15(10), 8005.
[23] Park, J., & Chen, X. (2025). Real-time feedback systems in logistics case discussions: A study of AI-facilitated peer assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(5), 1120-1145.
[24] Li, H., & Wang, K. (2025). Student-generated cases using AI: Empowering learners as co-creators in logistics courses. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(2), 155-170.
[25] Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2025). AI-powered scaffolding for case-based learning: A study of struggling students in logistics. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(7), 1205-1220.
[26] Xu, W., & Lu, J. (2025). AI-assisted virtual simulation in engineering education: A case study of large-span spatial structure design. Journal of Engineering Education, 114(4), 321-335.
[27] Chen, G., & Xie, M. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking through AI-driven debate platforms in supply chain management courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(4), 301-320.