Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2026, 8(10); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2026.081008.

Driving Factors, Potential Measurement and Spatial Heterogeneity of China’s Provincial-Level Trade Cooperation with South Korea

Author(s)

Xiu Li, Wei Liang, Hongxia Dong

Corresponding Author:
​Xiu Li
Affiliation(s)

Taishan University, Tai’an, China

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the deepening China-South Korea Free Trade Area and the implementation of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, this study examines provincial trade cooperation between China and South Korea using panel data from 2014-2023 and a time-varying stochastic frontier gravity model. The findings show that economic scale and innovation capacity significantly influence trade cooperation, while trade efficiency exhibits a four-layer gradient with uneven provincial potential. To enhance high-quality trade development, the study recommends adopting efficiency-based regional policies, strengthening key growth drivers, addressing non-efficiency constraints, and establishing long-term collaborative mechanisms to deepen China-South Korea economic cooperation.

Keywords

trade cooperation, influencing factors, trade potential, spatial heterogeneity

Cite This Paper

Xiu Li, Wei Liang, Hongxia Dong. Driving Factors, Potential Measurement and Spatial Heterogeneity of China’s Provincial-Level Trade Cooperation with South Korea. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 10: 57-66. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2026.081008.

References

[1] Geng Y, Ge T. Factors influencing China's exports to RCEP member countries and trade efficiency in the digital economy[J]. Productivity Research, 2024(08).

[2] Jiang X, Zhou M. Analysis of the impact of demographic structure changes on China's import and export trade: based on China's provincial panel data from 1998 to 2018[J]. Economic Research Guide, 2021(18).

[3] Li C. Exchange rate volatility and bilateral trade: evidence from East Asia[J]. Chinese Review of Financial Studies, 2016(06).

[4] Luan X, Kim J, So G. Impact of anti-dumping on Chinese exports to countries in ASEAN Plus 6[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2024, 60(15): 3695-3717.

[5] Sun Z, Li Y, Wang P. Cultural differences and bilateral trade: an empirical study based on industrial data from OECD and BRIICS countries[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2023, 59(9): 2787-2801.

[6] Wang J, Liao C, Xiong J, et al. Deepening of free trade agreements and international trade: evidence from China[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2023, 59(6): 1960-1975.

[7] Xue W, Song D. The value, logic and pathways of new quality productivity in enabling high-quality development of foreign trade[J]. Commercial Economics Research, 2025(06).

[8] Zhang J, Du Z. Analysis of influencing factors and potential of China's export trade with Northeast Asian countries[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Nationalities, 2025, 27(02).

[9] Zhu T, Liu Z. Domestic and transport distance and import and export trade: expand the gravity model and empirical[J]. World Economy Studies, 2019(06).

[10] Zou H, Cui R. Effects of real exchange rate and tariff rate changes on China's import and export[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2020(06).

[11] Maganioti A E, Chrissanthi H D, Charalabos P C, et al. Cointegration of event-related potential (ERP) signals in experiments with different electromagnetic field (EMF) conditions[J]. Health, 2010, 2(05): 400.