Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2020, 2(8); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2020.020812.

Research on the Relationship between Knowledge Types of High School and Problem Solving


Xiaohong Wu

Corresponding Author:
Xiaohong Wu

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, 644007, China


By taking part in all kinds of   chemistry learning and problem solving activities, students have accumulated abundant factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge and metacognitive knowledge, and those knowledge will have an effect on problem solving in chemistry. During the procedure of problem solving, students were limited by the immediate memory span, and as a result, perceptual system selectively recognizes information in a problem situation. What’s more, differences in recognition of problem solving were depended on students’ type and degree of knowledge, which vary from students to students because of different learning level, and at the same time, offer a new perspective for the study on problem solving.


Factual knowledge, Conceptual knowledge, Procedural knowledge, Metacognitive knowledge, Problem solving

Cite This Paper

Xiaohong Wu. Research on the Relationship between Knowledge Types of High School and Problem Solving. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2020) Vol. 2 Issue 8: 54-58. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2020.020812.


[1] Polya, G (1957). How to solve it. Princeton University Press Princeton Nj, vol.11, no.1, pp.12-13.

[2] Larkin, J., Mcdermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, pp.1335-1342.

[3] Simon, H. A., & Newell, A (1971). Human problem solving: the state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, vol.26, no.2, pp.145-159.

[4] Sugrue, B (2010). A theory-based framework for assessing domain-specific problem-solving ability. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, vol.14, no.3, pp.29-35.

[5] Heyworth, & Rex, M (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, vol.21, no.2, pp.195-211.

[6] Mayer, R. E., Wittrock, M. C (2006). Problem solving. In P A. Alexander & P H, Winne (Eds.).Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.287-304.

[7] Smith, M. U., & Good, R (1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: successful versus unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.21, no.9, pp.895-912.

[8] Dunbar, S. B., Koretz, D. M., Hoover, H. D (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, vol.4, no.4, pp.289-303.

[9] Bodner, G (1991). A view from chemistry. In M. U. Smith(Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving: views from the content domains. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.21-33.

[10] Cooper, M. M., & Sandiurena, S (2009). Design and validation of an instrument to assess metacognitive skillfulness in chemistry problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, vol.86, no.2, pp.240-245.