Tianjin Polytechnic University, College of Economic and Management, Tianjin 300387, China
On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of universities at home and abroad and our higher education standard quality system. In this paper, 34 evaluation indicators were selected, and the network hierarchical model (ANP) was applied, and the relative weight of each indicator in the evaluation was solved by Super Decision software. This paper tries to use the method of private capital into the comprehensive benefit of higher education to make scientific, reasonable and accurate assessment, so as to enhance the use efficiency of private capital and the level of running a school of higher education, to attract more private capital to participate in education, promote the combination of education and economy, improve higher education rely on the funding situation for a long time.
higher education; Private capital; Analytic hierarchy process (ANP); Index weight; Super Decision
Li-Shusheng, Li-Haijuan. ANP-based private capital into higher education comprehensive benefit evaluation. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2019) Vol.3, Num.1: 104-113.
 Ma Dexiu (2011). Accelerate the construction of a world-class university with quality as the core. China Higher Education, 21, pp.6.
 Wang Xiuming Chen Mingrui(2012). Application of AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Comprehensive Evaluation System of University Faculty. Journal of Hainan University (Natural Science Edition).
 Satty T L(1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Management Science, Vol. 23, No.7, pp.851-855.
 Satty T L(2001). Desion Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittburgh, RWS Publications.