International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2020, 2(6); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2020.020611.
Hong Li *
School of the Fine Arts and Design, Nanjing Normal University of Special Education, Nanjing 210038, Jiangsu, China
*Corresponding author
Exploring the orientation change and management path innovation of design art education value is of great importance for promoting the development of design art and improving the quality of design art talent training. Under the premise of analyzing the scientific and technological rationality and the market value orientation of the current design art education, this paper puts forward some innovative measures to change the value orientation of design art education from the aspects of reforming the curriculum system, setting up optional humanities courses with mixed subject knowledge such as design aesthetics and design ethics in the design departments, strengthening the interaction and integration of teachers specialized in design aesthetics and ethics, promoting the integration of design art, aesthetics and ethics academic community, and establishing the academic journals of design art and aesthetics, aiming to provide suggestions for the development of contemporary design art and the cultivation of design art talents.
Design Art; Reform of the Value of Design Art Education; Management Innovation
Hong Li. Orientation Change of the Value of Design Art Education and Management Path Innovation. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 6: 81-86. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2020.020611.
[1] Li Hong. Research on the Essence and Identity of Technology and Art.Research on Dialectics of Nature, 2015(8): 124-128.
[2] Bronwen Brown. 2000. World Textiles: A Visual Guide to Traditional Techniques. Reference Reviews, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 40-41.
[3] Jiang S.Q, E. Newton, C.W. M. Yuen, C. W. Kan. 2004.The Textile Design Using Chemical Silver Plating on Cotton and Polyester Fabrics. Research Journal f Textile and Apparel, Vol. B(NO.1):14-26.
[4] Li Manli. Reflections on the construction of general education concepts and systems in Chinese universities: 1995-2005. Peking University Education Review, 2006(3): 86-99+190.
[5] G .Terry Page & J . B . Tomas,International Dictionary of Education. New York: Nichols publishing Company 1978,P.348.
[6] Ted Tapper and David Palfreyman, Continuity and Change in the Collegiate Tradition.Higher Education Quarterly,Volume52, No.2, 1988, P.146.
[7] Li Hong. On the Interactive Symbiosis and Value of Technological Innovation and Art Innovation. Philosophical Trends,2015(10): 101-105.