Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society, 2020, 4(3); doi: 10.25236/IJNDES.040307.

The endogenous effects on the three judges group on the judicial circuit panel

Author(s)

Ziyu Wang

Corresponding Author:
Ziyu Wang
Affiliation(s)

Hefei No.1 High school    Hefei, Anhui province  230601, China

Abstract

The goal of this article is to examine whether the judges' votes can influence others' votes when serving on the appellate panels, which final decision is based on majority rule. The data of this article come from the same data of the article 'Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation under Panel Decision making' written by Farhang and Wawro. Section two of the article is to explain the general explanations of the peer effects. Furthermore, part three is about analyzing the data, then discussing and concluding.

Keywords

Endogenous effects, judges group, circuit panel

Cite This Paper

Ziyu Wang. The endogenous effects on the three judges group on the judicial circuit panel. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2020) Vol.4, Issue 3: 85-94. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.040307.

References

[1] Antoine Barbot, Michael S. Landy, Marisa Carrasco; Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on second-order texture contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision 2012;12(8):6
[2] Cross, Frank B., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals,” 107 Yale Law Journal 2155–76.
[3] Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space,” 23 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 303–25.
[4] Epstein, Lee, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner. 2011. “Why (and When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,” 3 Journal of Legal Analysis 101–37.
[5] Farhang, Sean, and Gregory Wawro. 2004. “Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making,” 20 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 299–330.
[6] Dahl, Gordon B., Katrine V. Løken, and Magne Mogstad. 2012. "Peer Effects in Program Participation." NBER Working Paper 18198.
[7] Davezies, L., d'Haultfoeuille, X., Fougère, D. 2006. “Identification of peer effects using  group size variation.” Discussion Paper No. 2324, IZA
[8] Thomas J. Miles, The Law’s Delay: A Test of the Mechanisms of Judicial Peer Effects, Journal of Legal Analysis, Volume 4, Issue 2, Winter 2012, Pages 301–327
[9] Timo Hiller & Timo Hiller, 2013. "Peer Effects in Endogenous Networks," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 564, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
[10] Marin K. Levy and Adam S. Chilton, Challenging the Randomness of Panel Assignment in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 101 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2015)
[11] McLeod, S. A. (2019, May 20). What a p-value tells you about statistical significance. Simply Psychology.
Monica Harber Carney, “Identifying Peer Effects: Thinking outside the ‘Linear-in-Means’ Box”, March 20, 2013
Joshua B. Fischman “Interpreting Circuit Court Voting Patterns: A Social Interactions Framework”, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 31, No. 4
[12] Zimmerman, David J. 2003. "Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment." The Review of Economics and Statistics 85(1): 9-23.