Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2020, 2(16); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2020.021622.

Analysis of Project Investment Control Based on the Perspective of the Cost and Benefit: Taking the Integrated Training Center as an Example

Author(s)

Wang Jin

Corresponding Author:
Wang Jin
Affiliation(s)

Southwest University of political science and Law, 401120, China

Abstract

As an important part of teaching resources, laboratory provides a strong guarantee for all teaching activities, scientific research activities and the basic life of teachers and students in home ownership colleges and universities, and plays a very important role in the teaching services of home ownership colleges. The management status of construction home ownership can not only affect the service quality and service level of construction home ownership, but also have a certain impact on the overall image of home ownership colleges. With the expansion of colleges and universities for home purchases in recent years, more and more local governance entities have stepped into infrastructure. This is not only a huge development opportunity for construction and property purchases, but also makes college home purchases face severe challenges. It is particularly important to investigate and analyze the current situation of construction property management and reform its existing problems. The core issue is how to minimize the investment of construction property purchase and provide better services at the lowest investment. It is the core goal of this research.

Keywords

Liability risk, Project investment control

Cite This Paper

Wang Jin. Analysis of Project Investment Control Based on the Perspective of the Cost and Benefit: Taking the Integrated Training Center as an Example. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2020) Vol. 2 Issue 16: 142-147. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2020.021622.

References

[1] Mann, Michael (2012). Sources of Social Power. The Rise of Investment and ControlAnalysis, 1760-1914.New York: Cambridge University Press, vol.23, no.12, pp.25-36.
[2]  Merton, Robert. (1968). Social Capital and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, vol.35, no.8, pp.68-74.
[3] Migdal, Joel (2004). Boundaries and investment: States and Societies in the Struggle to Shape Identities and Local Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol.152, no.23, pp.123-134.
[4] Miliband. Ralph (2016). The Capitalist Cost State. Reply to NicosPoulantzas. New Left Review, vol.25, no.59, pp. 253-262.