International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2020, 2(9); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2020.020902.
Lili Mu*
College of Continuing Education Guilin Tourism University,Guilin, China
*Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]
"One Belt One Road" is a major strategic measure proposed by my country to promote international regional cooperation and promote world economic development. Among them, cultural exchanges and cultural cooperation undoubtedly provide an opportunity for countries along the "Belt and Road" to deepen mutual understanding and build consensus on values. Combining the digital cross-border dissemination of Guangxi's intangible cultural heritage and the “Belt and Road” initiative, it is extremely important to strengthen the vitality of Guangxi's intangible cultural heritage. The purpose of this article is to study the digital cross-border communication of Guangxi's intangible cultural heritage under the background of the Belt and Road Initiative. This article analyzes the path of Guangxi's external digital cross-border communication under the background of "One Belt One Road" from the level of communication elements such as communication subject, communication audience, communication channel, and communication content. This paper uses questionnaires to understand the current situation of digital cross-border communication outside of Guangxi's intangible cultural heritage under the background of the “Belt and Road”, discover the advantages and disadvantages in the communication, and then conduct targeted path analysis and propose improvement strategies. The experimental survey research shows that in the question of "How do you think Guangxi actively integrates into the cultural construction of the "Belt and Road"", 75.5% of the respondents chose "significant" and "significant".
One Belt One Road, Intangible Cultural Heritage, Digital Cross-Border Communication, Questionnaire Survey
Lili Mu. Digital Cross-Border Communication of Guangxi's Intangible Cultural Heritage under the Background of the Belt and Road Initiative. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 9: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2020.020902.
[1] Pratikakis I, Savelonas M A, Mavridis P, et al. Predictive digitisation of cultural heritage objects. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2018, 77(10):12991-13021.
[2] Cardona M, Duch-Brown, Néstor, Martens B. Consumer Perceptions of (Cross-Border) Ecommerce in the EU Digital Single Market. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, 27(2):195-202.
[3] Bercigli M. Dissemination Strategies for Cultural Heritage: The Case of the Tomb of Zechariah in Jerusalem, Israel. Heritage, 2019, 2(1):306-314.
[4] Xiao Z, Deling Y. The "Hyper-Presence" of Cultural Heritage in Shaping Collective Memory. Presence, 2019, 27(1):107-135.
[5] Felice S L, Abebe T, Aquino A, et al. Geological and Cultural Heritage: Dissemination Experiences in Tuscany. Heritage, 2019, 2(3):2171-2182.
[6] Sgherri E, Anzani G. The Fortress of Riolo Terme, near Ravenna: digital survey and 3D printing for cultural dissemination. Studies in Digital Heritage, 2017, 1(2):750.
[7] Subbotina O A, Sonawane U. COOPERATION ACROSS CULTURES: FROM BASIC COMPONENTS OF CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION TO NEW STRATEGIES IN DIVERSITY MARKETING. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2015, 251(1):9-14.
[8] Lee A L, Mader E M, Morley C P. Teaching cross-cultural communication skills online: a multi-method evaluation.. Family Medicine, 2015, 47(4):302-308.
[9] Lee J, Shrum L J, Yi Y. The role of cultural communication norms in social exclusion effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2017, 27(1):108-116.
[10] Loiacono V, Fallon J M. Intangible Cultural Heritage Beyond Borders: Egyptian Bellydance (Raqs Sharqi) as a Form of Transcultural Heritage. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 2018, 39(3):286-304.