Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2021, 3(3); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2021.030302.
Jia Liu1, 2, Xiaoyan Hao2, Zeyan Li2, Xiaolei Wang2*
1Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081
2School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
*Corresponding Author
The innovation and development ability of industry mainly reflects in the industrial innovation activity and the innovation environment improvement. Therefore, this paper analyzes the development and innovation ability of industrial enterprises above designated size (IEADSs) in Inner Mongolia. Two-stage DEA method was used in the project evaluated the technological innovation efficiency in the stage of scientific and technological research and development and the technological innovation efficiency in the stage of achievement transformation of IEADSs in Inner Mongolia. In order to compare the related efficiency, we evaluated the innovation efficiency of IEADSs of 11 provinces and cities in western China. It shows that in the stage of scientific and technological research and development, Inner Mongolia has the lowest innovation efficiency.
industrial development, innovation ability evaluation, two-stage DEA, Inner Mongolia
Jia Liu, Xiaoyan Hao, Zeyan Li, Xiaolei Wang. Inner Mongolia industrial development innovation ability evaluation. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2021) Vol. 3, Issue 3: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2021.030302.
[1] Si-hui, CHEN(2017). Innovation Performance of the Provincial Scale Industries in China——Based on the HCA-SEM ( Super Efficiency)-DEA Model[J]. R&D Management, vol.29,no.02,pp.102-115.
[2] DONG Deng-zhen, YANG Qian, GONG Ming(2017). Evaluation and Analysis on Industry Innovation Ability in Chinese Provincial Regions[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition).vol.30,no.03,pp.52-59.
[3] WANG Bo, FENG Feng, AN Qingxian(2014). Analysis and Evaluation on Efficiency of Regional High-tech Industry R&D Activities —on the Basis of a New and Improved Two-stage Network DEA Model[J]. Science and Technology Management Research. no.5,pp.58-64.
[4] ANDERSEN,P. PETERSEN N C(1993). A procedure for ranking efficient Units in data envelopment analysis[J].Management Science, vol.39,no.10,pp.1261-1264.
[5] Chen Wei, Feng Zhijun(2010). Evaluation Research on the Innovation Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems of China——A New View Based on Chain Relational Network DEA Model [J].Journal of Intelligence. Vol.29,no.12,pp.24-30.
[6] MA Jian-feng, HE Feng(2014).Two-stage DEA Efficiency Evaluation of Technological Innovation with Shared Inputs and Free intermediate Outputs[J]. Systems Engineering. Vol.32,no.1,pp.1-9.
[7] G. E. Battese,T. J. Coelli(1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India[J] . Journal of Productivity Analysis .no.1.
[8] R. D. Banker,A. Charnes,W. W. Cooper(1984).Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis[J] . Management Science . no.9.