Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(3); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.030306.

A Study on Critical Pedagogy's View of Curriculum Knowledge

Author(s)

Fengyun Wei*

Corresponding Author:
Fengyun Wei
Affiliation(s)

Faculty of Education of Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Only when knowledge becomes legal knowledge can it enter the field of curriculum. Critical pedagogy holds that curriculum knowledge is the knowledge of the ruling class and represents the interests of the ruling class; the curriculum knowledge is chosen by the dominant class in the society with its power, and the knowledge in line with the interests of the class is given a legal status and introduced into the school; because the curriculum knowledge can reproduce the ideology of the ruling class, spread its culture, and finally consolidate its position, the ruling class of has to strictly screen the curriculum knowledge into the school; the criterion of selection is to conform to the ideology of the ruling class, so that the knowledge finally selected is the knowledge that represents the ideology and values of the ruling class. Critical pedagogy opens a new perspective and methodology system for the study of curriculum knowledge selection, but it also has some limitations.

Keywords

Critical Pedagogy, Curriculum Knowledge, Selection

Cite This Paper

Fengyun Wei. A Study on Critical Pedagogy's View of Curriculum Knowledge. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 3: 26-30. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.030306.

References

[1] Wei Fengyun, Yu Wei(2018). Review and analysis of McLaren's School Life. Social Science Front, vol.274, no.4, p. 276-280.

[2] Wei Fengyun, Yu Wei(2017). Review of Peter McLaren's School Life: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy. Journal of Education, vol.13, no.6, p. 118-126.

[3] Xin Zhiyang(2006). Critical pedagogy interpretation[J]. Journal of Comparative Education Research, no.7, p.6-11. 

[4] Wu Yongjun(1999). Curriculum Sociology. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press, p.149.

[5] Michael W.Apple (2004). Ideology and Curriculum. Routledge, p. 64-63.

[6] Jiang Jianhua(2010). Knowledge power curriculum: curriculum research from the perspective of policy. Beijing: Education Science Press, p. 66.

[7] Beyer, Landon E(1998).The curriculum: problems, politics, and possibilities. State University of New York Press.

[8] Giroux, H. (1983). Theory, resistance, and education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

[9] Bouldieu(1997). Cultural Capital and Social Alchemy. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House.

[10] Bourdieu(2002).Reproduction: The Essential Points of an Educational System Theory. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.

[11] Hudis, P(2012). Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

[12] Paulo Freire(1996). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

[13] Saad-Filho (2003).Anti-capitalism: A marxist introduction. London: Pluto Press.

[14] Jiang Junhe(2012). A Study on the Legitimacy of Curriculum Knowledge in American Primary and Secondary Schools. Northeast Normal University.

[15] Wei Fengyun(2019). A Study on McLaren's Critical Pedagogy -- with the Clue of Life in School. Northeast Normal University.