Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society, 2021, 5(1); doi: 10.25236/IJNDES.2021.050103.

Hiring Bias: Does the Degree of Similarity between the Previous Employee Affect Hiring Tendency?

Author(s)

Yiheng Helen Lin

Corresponding Author:
Yiheng Helen Lin
Affiliation(s)

Shenzhen Middle School, Shenzhen, 518001, China

Abstract

Prejudice and workplace discrimination have been paid attention to by people from different culture backgrounds, and one possible explanation for some of the defect in hiring that we come up with is that previous employees are more or less a benchmark when companies look for new employees to replace them. In this report, we design and carry out rigorous statistics-based analysis to investigate the possible hiring bias based on status quo. Through providing definitions of the key factors of status quo and describing the proposed steps for our studies, we identify that the personality of the previous employees has the greatest influence on hiring new employees, followed by appearance, gender, region and educational background.

Keywords

prejudice, workplace discrimination, status quo bias, previous employees, similarity

Cite This Paper

Yiheng Helen Lin. Hiring Bias: Does the Degree of Similarity between the Previous Employee Affect Hiring Tendency?. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2021) Vol.5, Issue 1: 15-18. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.2021.050103.

References

[1] H. Fang & A. Moro. Theories of statistical discrimination and affirmative action: a survey. J. Benhabib, M.O. Jackson, A. Bisin (Eds.), Handbook of social economics, Volume 1A, Elsevier, North Holland, 2011

[2] Gabriele Mari & Ruud Luijkx. Gender, parenthood, and hiring intentions in sex-typical jobs: Insights from a survey experiment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Volume 65, 2020

[3] D.J. Aigner & G.G. Cain. Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 30 (2) (1977), 175-187

[4] K.K. Charles & J. Guryan. Studying discrimination: Fundamental challenges and recent progress. Annual Review of Economics, 3 (1) (2011), pp. 479-511

[5] S. Baert. Career lesbians. Getting hired for not having kids? Industrial Relations Journal, 45 (6) (2014), 543-561

[6] S.O. Becker & A. Fernandes & D. Weichselbaumer. Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Labour Economics, 2019

[7] M. Biewen, S. Seifert. Potential parenthood and career progression of men and women: A simultaneous hazards approach. IZA Discussion Paper, No.10050, 2016

[8] N.D. Gupta, N. Smith. Children and career interruptions: The family gap in Denmark. Economica, 69 (276) (2002), 609-629

[9] J. Jessen & R. Jessen & J. Kluve. Punishing potential mothers? Evidence for statistical employer discrimination from a natural experiment. Labour Economics, 2019 

[10] P. Petit. The effects of age and family constraints on gender hiring discrimination: A field experiment in the French financial sector. Labour Economics, 14 (3) (2007), 371-391

[11] C.M. Yip & R.S.-K. Wong. Gender-oriented statistical discrimination theory: Empirical evidence from the Hong Kong labor market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 37 (2014), 43-59

[12] Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler (1991). The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 1991, 139-206