First of all, provide standards on how to effectively evaluate the health of the higher education system. We start from three aspects: economy, higher education development, and technological level. Through consulting the data, the representative factors of these three aspects are selected as the indicators of FCE, and the weights of different factors on the health of the higher education system are obtained through AHP, and then the health value and health level of the higher education system are calculated. And take China as an example to demonstrate this set of evaluation models, and based on the topological sorting diagram, we planned the time schedule required for the change of indicators.

Chenghao Yue, Chenxu He, Shouxi Li. Evaluation and Analysis of the Health of Higher Education System. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2021) Vol. 3, Issue 5: 91-94. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2021.030515.

[1] James A Bovaird and Natalie A Koziol. High-stakes education research: Enhanced scrutiny of the education system and its consequences. 2010.

[2] John H.|And Others Meier. An education system for high-risk infants: A preventive approach to developmental and learning disabilities. 1970.

[3] Maia Chankseliani and Tristan Mccowan. Higher education and the sustainable development goals. 2020.

[4] Owen Corrigan and Lucy Lee. Technical matters: building a high quality technical and vocational route through the education system. Policy Exchange, 2013.