International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(8); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.030807.
Xinling Zou1,2, Xiang Liu3 and Xuan Zhou3
1School of resource Environment and Safety engineering, University of south China, Hengyang 421001 Hunan China
2School of resource Environment and Safety engineering, University of south China, Hengyang 421001 Hunan China
3School of Microelectronics and communication engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
In recent years, with the rapid development of science and technology, the construction of smart city has entered a new climax. But at the same time, due to the construction of smart city is still in the initial stage, there is no unified standard at home and abroad, so that the specific implementation process often leaves deficiencies, such as the more prominent problem of urban water pollution control efficiency. However, the research on this aspect is still blank in China. Therefore, this paper puts forward an empirical study on the impact of environmental protection technology investment based on smart city construction on urban water pollution control efficiency. This paper studies the core concepts of smart city construction and urban water pollution control. In order to improve the efficiency of water pollution control, we must establish a set of objective and scientific evaluation index system and matching efficiency calculation method. Therefore, this paper innovatively puts forward the empirical method of investment efficiency of environmental protection science and technology for water pollution control in smart city. Based on the current situation of smart city construction, this method classifies the factors that affect the efficiency of water pollution control, and optimizes the calculation method of empirical model. The optimized empirical model can be applied to smart cities with various economic structures, and is not limited by the size of the city, which can maximize the applicability of the model. In order to verify the actual effect of the empirical method, this paper takes Chongqing as the test object, and collects the data of the city in recent five years as the experimental sample. Through the analysis of the results of empirical tests, it can be seen that the test method of water pollution control efficiency in this paper has high accuracy, and can play an important role in water pollution control of smart city construction.
Smart City Construction, Water Pollution Control, mpirical research, Investment in Environmental Protection
Xinling Zou, Xiang Liu and Xuan Zhou. Empirical Study on the Impact of Environmental Protection Technology Investment on Urban Water Pollution Control Efficiency Based on Smart City Construction. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 8: 47-58. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.030807.
[1] Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The 'actually existing smart city'. Social ence Electronic Publishing, 8(1), 13-25.
[2] Hashem, I. A. T., Chang, V., Anuar, N. B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I., & Gani, A., et al. (2016). The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 748-758.
[3] Li, Y., Dai, W., Ming, Z., & Qiu, M. (2016). Privacy protection for preventing data over-collection in smart city. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(5), 1339-1350.
[4] Centenaro, M., Vangelista, L., Zanella, A., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the iot and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(5), 60.
[5] Calzada, I., & Cobo, C. (2015). Unplugging: deconstructing the smart city. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 23-43.
[6] Rossi, U. (2016). The variegated economics and the potential politics of the smart city. Territory Politics Governance, 4(3), 1-17.
[7] Chapman, L., Muller, C. L., Young, D. T., Warren, E. L., Grimmond, C. S. B., & Cai, X. M., et al. (2015). The birmingham urban climate laboratory: an open meteorological test bed and challenges of the smart city. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(9), 197-210.
[8] Menouar, H., Guvenc, I., Akkaya, K., Uluagac, A. S., Kadri, A., & Tuncer, A. (2017). Uav-enabled intelligent transportation systems for the smart city: applications and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(3), 22-28.
[9] Paganelli, F., Turchi, S., & Giuli, D. (2017). A web of things framework for restful applications and its experimentation in a smart city. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(4), 1412-1423.
[10] Zhang Chengzheng, & Gao Yang. Study on environmental protection investment in xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang Vocational University, 026 (001), 39-42.
[11] Li, X., & Liu, Q. (2019). Simulation research on the interaction between environmental protection investment and economic growth in china. Natural Hazards, 95(1), 257-269.
[12] Nanteuil, A. D. (2016). Green latin america? some reflections on environmental issues in latin america's new instruments of investment protection. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 17(4), 594-613.
[13] Bień, & Ewa. (2016). Eu funds and adaptation of enterprises to the requirements of environmental protection. Desalination & Water Treatment, 57(3), 951-963.
[14] Liu Jia, & Sun Hongmei. (2015). Improvement on supporting policies and systems for investment in shanghai environmental protection industry. Environmental Science and Management, 040 (005), 156-159.
[15] Ma, X., Bi, L., & Wang, Z. A. (2016). Effect of air pollution on provincial fiscal investment for environmental protection in china. Nature Environment & Pollution Technology, 15(1), 27-34.
[16] J. Li, Z. Yin, & F. Song. (2018). Characteristics, status and strategies of environmental protection investment and financing in china. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 17(1), 161-168.
[17] Wu, Y., Sheng, J., & Huang, F. (2015). China's future investments in environmental protection and control of manufacturing industry: lessons from developed countries. Natural Hazards, 77(3), 1889-1901.
[18] Hu Yuanlin, & Cui Dan. (2019). The empirical study on the influence factors of enterprise investment in environment protection. Ecological Economy, 035 (001), 161-166.
[19] David, F., & Sandra, P. (2015). On the complementary nature of cgc‐ms, cgc‐ftir, and cgc‐aed for water pollution control. Journal of Separation ence, 14(8), 554-557.
[20] Drevno, & Ann. (2016). Policy tools for agricultural nonpoint source water pollution control in the u.s. and e.u. Management of Environmental Quality an International Journal, 27(2), 106-123.
[21] Wang Qining. (2019). Establishment of rural water pollution control performance evaluation system based on balanced score card——analysis of township environmental protection institutes in anhui province. Environmental Protection Science, 045 (001), 14-19.
[22] Zhang, J. R., Wang, J. N., Zeng, W. H., Jiang, H. Q., & Yang, F. L. (2015). Performance evaluation on the water pollution control charging policy of dianchi lake basin. China Environmental ence, 35(2), 634-640.
[23] Gobbi, R. G., Demange, M. K., Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José de Arimatéia Batista Araújo Filho, & Camanho, G. L. (2017). Patellar tracking after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: dynamic evaluation using computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25(10), 3197-3205.
[24] Neto, J., Albuquerque, V., Silva, G., Olegario, N., & Joao, M. R. S. T. (2016). Gonet - a new movement dynamic evaluation system in real time. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 13(12), 3928-3933.
[25] Amaral, M. A., Cláudia T Candotti, Navarro, I. J. R. L., Gontijo, K. N. S., & Loss, J. F. (2019). Dynamic evaluation method of lower limb joint alignment with parallel feet (madaami-p): content validation and reproducibility. Motricidade, 15(1), 68-78.