Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(13); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031306.

A Conversation Analysis of Sensitive Talk in Clinic Interaction

Author(s)

Anyuan Chen

Corresponding Author:
Anyuan Chen
Affiliation(s)

Shanxi Engineering Science and Technology University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China

Abstract

Nowadays, the relationship between the doctor and the patient in China is not so harmonious and medical disputes often occur. As we know, the communication between the doctor and the patient is not balanced, because the doctor has power to dominate the whole conversation. And when the topics of conversations are sensitive, the communication is becoming less fluent, and the patient is not willing to cooperate with the doctor or refuses to answer the questions, which causes some impacts on the conversation and is not favorable for the diagnosis of the diseases. Based on the tape-recordings and transcriptions of naturally occurring doctor-patient conversations in Chinese outpatient clinics, this paper analyses some data from different topics of sensitive talk, summarizes the respective sequence patterns and concludes some language features of such conversations, hoping to find some common characters in order to improve and better the relationship between the doctor and the patient, which can promote the diagnosis of the diseases. 

Keywords

Conversation analysis, Doctor-patient communication, Sensitive talk

Cite This Paper

Anyuan Chen. A Conversation Analysis of Sensitive Talk in Clinic Interaction. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 13: 36-45. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031306.

References

[1] Heritage, John & Maynard, Douglas W. Communication in Medical Care[M]. London: The University of Cambridge Press, 2006.

[2]  Hutchby, Ian & Wooffitt, Robin. Conversation Analysis[M]. Oxford: Polity Press, 1998.

[3] Heritage, J. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.

[4] Have, Paul. Doing Conversation Analysis[M]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007.

[5] Heritage, John & Robinson, Jeffrey. Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care [A]. Heritage, John& Maynard, Douglas W, (eds). Communication in Medical Care[C]. Cambridge: CUP, 2006.

[6] Halkowski, Timothy. Realizing the illness: patients’ narratives of symptom discovery[A]. Heritage, John& Maynard, Douglas W, (eds). Communication in Medical Care[C]. Cambridge: CUP, 2006.

[7] Stivers, Tanya. Treatment decisions: negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters [A]. Heritage, John& Maynard, Douglas W, (eds). Communication in Medical Care[C]. Cambridge: CUP, 2006.

[8] Perakyla, Anssi. Communicating and responding to diagnosis[A]. Heritage, John.&Maynard, Douglas W, (eds). Communication in Medical Care[C]. Cambridge: CUP,   2006.

[9] Maynard, Douglas W. & Frankel, Richard M. On diagnostic rationality: bad news, good news, and the symptom residue[A]. Heritage, John & Maynard, Douglas W, (eds). Communication in Medical Care[C]. Cambridge: CUP, 2006.

[10] Byrne, Patrick S. & Long, Barrie E.L. Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviours of Doctors in the Cosultation[M]. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1976.

[11] Schegloff, E.A. Sequence organization, from work in progress tentatively entitled Talking in Interaction: An Introduction to Conversation Analysis[C], 1999.

[12] Drew, Paul. Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences[A]. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, (eds). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.