Welcome to Francis Academic Press
Login | Register

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(15); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031512.

Discussion on the Teaching Reform of Urban Master Planning Under the Background of Territorial Space Planning

Author(s)

Jun Shao

Corresponding Author:
Jun Shao
Affiliation(s)

School of Urban Construction, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Abstract

The advent of the era of territorial space planning poses new challenges to urban planning education. As the core curriculum of urban planning, urban master planning needs to actively respond to the national strategy and local practical needs, and reform the teaching. The article attempts to analyze the core demands of territorial and spatial planning for the teaching of master planning from three aspects: knowledge system, professional skills, and value orientation, and discusses the three aspects of teaching mode, teaching content and teaching methods. In the teaching mode, we should carry out joint teaching within the school, school-enterprise, and school-government to promote the collaborative participation of multiple parties. In the teaching content, we should build a multi-core knowledge and skill system, focusing on the integration and application of knowledge. In the teaching method, we should adopt modular teaching that closely integrates theory courses, design courses, and seminars, and pay attention to the cultivation of thinking ability and tolerance.

Keywords

Territorial Space Planning, Master Planning, Teaching Reform

Cite This Paper

Jun Shao. Discussion on the Teaching Reform of Urban Master Planning Under the Background of Territorial Space Planning. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 15: 90-96. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031512.

References

[1] Andrea Frank, Detlef Kurth. (2010) Planning Education in Germany: Impact of the Bologna Agreement. disP -The Planning Review, 3: 25-35.

[2] Klaus R Kunzmann. (2018) Urban Planning Education. disP -The Planning Review, 2: 127-128.

[3] Yang Hui, Wang Yang. (2020) "Old Diseases" and "New Issues": Discussion on the Education of Urban and Rural Planning Under the Background of Territorial Space Planning. Planners, 36: 16-21.

[4] Zhu Chasong, Wang Yanran. (2021) Exploration on the Teaching Reform of Urban Master Planning under the Background of National Space Planning. Urbanism and Architecture, 18: 97-100.

[5] Hennig E I, Schwick C, Soukup T, et al. (2015) Multi- Scale Analysis of Urban Sprawl in Europe: Towards a European De-Sprawling Strategy. Land Use Policy, 49: 483-498.

[6] Yang Y, Zhang L, Ye Y,et al. (2020) Curbing Sprawl with Development-Limiting Boundaries in Urban China: A Review of Literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 35:25-40.

[7] Nazarnia N, Schwick C, Jaeger J A G. (2016) Accelerated Urban Sprawl in Montreal,Quebec City, and Zurich: Investigating the Differences Using Time Series 1951-2011[J]. Ecological Indicators, 60:1229-1251.

[8] Jaeger J A G, Schwick C. (2014) Improving the Measurement of Urban Sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (Wup) and Its Application to Switzerland. Ecological Indicator, 38:294-308.

[9] LIU Hetao, TIAN Lingling, TIAN Ye, et al. (2015) Exploring the Spatial Expression and Governance Policies of Urban Sprawl in Wuhan. Economic Geography, 35: 47-53.

[10] YANG Jiankun, ZENG Long. (2019) Does the Promotion Incentives of Local Official in China Affect Urban Spatial Expansion: Empirical Evidence Based on 263 Prefectures- Level and Above Cities.Modern Economics Research, 8: 25-34.