Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(15); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031519.

Research on Decision-Making Behavior of Social E-Commerce Marketing Subject

Author(s)

Xiaomeng Huang, Yunfu Huo

Corresponding Author:
Xiaomeng Huang
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Dalian University, Dalian, 116000, China

Abstract

As a new value-added online business model in the field of e-commerce, understanding consumer behaviour in the interactive social e-commerce environment provides new opportunities for businesses to develop marketing strategies to increase profits. Aiming at the bounded rational behaviour of participants in social e-commerce, an evolutionary game model is constructed, this paper analyses the behaviour interaction and strategy selection mechanism between merchant’s choice of opinion leader, product recommendation and consumer’s purchase decision by evolutionary game theory, and further discusses it with numerical simulation. The results show that the bigger or smaller the proportion of the transaction, the smaller the recommendation cost and the bigger the psychological effect of the consumer, the faster the players reach the equilibrium. 

Keywords

Social E-commerce, Opinion Leader, Consumer Purchase Intention, Evolutionary Game

Cite This Paper

Xiaomeng Huang, Yunfu Huo. Research on Decision-Making Behavior of Social E-Commerce Marketing Subject. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 15: 152-158. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031519.

References

[1] Mangold W G ,  Faulds D J . Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix[J]. Business Horizons, 2009, 52(4):357-365.

[2] AT Stephen, O Toubia. Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2010 , 47(2), 215–228.

[3] Zhang K ,  Benyoucef M . Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2016.

[4] Ko, Hsiu-Chia. Social desire or commercial desire? The factors driving social sharing and shopping intentions on social commerce platforms[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2018:1-15.

[5] Wang X ,  Tajvidi M ,  Lin X , et al. Towards an Ethical and Trustworthy Social Commerce Community for Brand Value Co-creation: A trust-Commitment Perspective[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 167

[6] Hussin,  Che A R , Busalim, et al. Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research[J]. International journal of information management, 2016

[7] Horng S M ,  Wu C L . How Behaviors on Social Network Sites and Online Social Capital Influence Social Commerce Intentions[J]. Information & Management, 2019, 57(2):103176.

[8] Zaryab, S., Liu, Y., Tahir, I., Zahid, H. and Ikram, U.K. “Impact of social commerce constructs and social support on social commerce intentions”, Information Technology and People, 2018, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 68-93.

[9] Lazarsfeld. P. F. Berelson B. Gaudet H. The People:s Choice: How the voter makes up his  Mind  in  a  Presidential  Campaign[M].  New York:  Columbia University Press, 1944:99-100.

[10] Liping Xiong, Vincent Cho, Kris MY Law & Lianne Lam (2021): A study of KOL effectiveness on brand image of skincare products, Enterprise Information Systems, DOI:10.1080/17517575.2021.1924864