Compared with other types of ion batteries, lithium-ion batteries have great advantages in specific capacity, self-discharge rate, performance and price. Therefore, lithium-ion batteries have developed rapidly and are widely used in aerospace, portable equipment and so on.The rul prediction method of lithium-ion battery is developing from experimental reliability to practical reliability, expanding the application scope of the prediction method and ensuring reliable ex ante maintenance, which can not only ensure the safety of personnel, property and equipment in civil use. There are two main methods for rul prediction of lithium-ion battery: one is to build a capacity decline model based on the internal electrochemical mechanism of the battery, Due to the complex internal chemical mechanism of the battery, the differences between the same batch of batteries lead to its application limitations; The second is the data-driven method. Through the extraction of parameters in the process of battery operation, such as voltage and current, support vector machine, artificial neural network and other methods are used for prediction. From the prediction results, the data-driven method has high precision and wide application. It is the mainstream research method at present.It is of great significance to accurately determine the health status of lithium-ion batteries. To address the problem that the prediction of a single limit learning machine algorithm is prone to jumping, the method of using artificial fish swarm optimization to optimize the limit learning machine is proposed to try its best to predict the model of the remaining life of lithium-ion batteries. Firstly, the isovoltage discharge time is extracted as an indirect health factor, then the limit learning machine is optimised using the artificial fish swarm algorithm to build an indirect prediction model for the remaining life of Li-ion batteries, and finally a validation evaluation is carried out based on the NASA dataset B0005-B0006. The experimental results show that the proposed model predicts stable prediction results with high accuracy and small error in prediction results.

Qinfeng Zhao, Yanping Cai and Xingjun Wang. Review on Prediction Methods of Remaining Useful Life of Lithium Ion Batteries. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 16: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031606.

[1] LUCU M, MARTINEZ-LASERNA E, GANDIAGA I, et al. A critical review on self-adaptive Li-ion battery ageing models [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 401(OCT.15):85-101.

[2] HOSSAIN L, HANNAN M A, H AINI, et al. A review of state of health and remaining useful life estimation methods for lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles: Challenges and recommendations [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 205:115-133.

[3] WASSILIADIS N, ADERMANN J, FRERICKS A, et al. Revisiting the dual extended Kalman filter for battery state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation: A use-case life cycle analysis [J]. The Journal of Energy Storage, 2018, 19(OCT.):73-87.

[4] LI T, SUN S, SATTAR T P, et al. Fighting Sample Degeneracy and Impoverishment in Particle Filters: A Review of Intelligent Approaches [J].  2013.

[5] DUONG P, RAGHAVAN N. Heuristic Kalman optimized particle filter for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery [J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2018, 81: págs. 232-243.

[6] QIU X, WU W, WANG S. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery based on improved cuckoo search particle filter and a novel state of charge estimation method[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 450:227700.

[7] ZHANG H, MIAO Q, ZHANG X, et al. An improved unscented particle filter approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction [J]. Microelectronics and reliability, 2018, 81(Feb.):288-298.

[8] CHEN L, J An, WANG H, et al. Remaining useful life prediction for lithium-ion battery by combining an improved particle filter with sliding-window gray model[J]. Energy Reports, 2020, 6:2086-2093.

[9] V.H. Johnson. Battery performance models in ADVISOR [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 110(2): 321-329.

[10] HU X S, Li S B, Peng H E. A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 198: 359-367.

[11] HE H, XIONG R, GUO H, et al. Comparison study on the battery models used for the energy management of batteries in electric vehicles [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2012, 64:113-121.

[12] WAAG W, K?Bitz S, Sauer D U. Application-specific parameterization of reduced order equivalent circuit battery models for improved accuracy at dynamic load[J]. Measurement, 2013, 46(10):4085-4093.

[13] ZHANG Q, WHITE R E. Capacity fade analysis of a lithium-ion cell [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 179(2): 793-798.

[14] PRASAD G K, RAHN C D. Model based identification of aging parameters in lithium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 232(jun.15):79-85.

[15] VIRKAR A V. A model for degradation of electrochemical devices based on linear non-equilibrium thermodynamics and its application to lithium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(14):5970-5984.

[16] S NCHEZ L, COUSO I, GONZ LEZ M. A design methodology for semi-physical fuzzy models applied to the dynamic characterization of LiFePO4 batteries [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 14: 269-288.

[17] RICHARDSON R R, OSBORNE M, HOWEY D A. Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of health [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 357:209-219.

[18] NG S, XING Y, TSUI K L. A naive Bayes model for robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 118(apr.1):114-123.

[19] PARTHIBAN T, RAVI R, KALAISELVI N. Exploration of artificial neural network [ANN] to predict the electrochemical characteristics of lithium-ion cells [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2008, 53(4):1877-1882.

[20] EDDAHECH A, BRIAT O, BERTRAND N, et al. Behavior and State-of-Health Monitoring of Li-ion Batteries Using Impedance Spectroscopy and Recurrent Neural Networks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2012, 42(1):487-494.

[21] ZHANG Y, XIONG R, HE H, et al. Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018:1-1.

[22] Anaissi A, Khoa N, Mustapha S, et al. Adaptive One-Class Support Vector Machine for Damage Detection in Structural Health Monitoring[C]// Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2017.

[23] Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-Vector Networks [J]. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3):273-297.

[24] Satpal S B, Y Khandare…. Structural health monitoring of a cantilever beam using support vector machine [J]. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 2013, 5(1):1-7.

[25] Datong Liu et al. Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation with an optimized Relevance Vector Machine algorithm with incremental learning [J]. Measurement, 2015, 63: 143-151.

[26] Zhao G, Zhang G, Liu Y, et al. Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction with Deep Belief Network and Relevance Vector Machine[C]// IEEE International Conference on Prognostics & Health Management. IEEE, 2017.

[27] Huang G B, Zhu Q Y, Siew C K. Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications [J]. Neurocomputing, 2006, 70(1/3):489-501.

[28] Gu W, Sun Z, Wei X, et al. A new method of accelerated life testing based on the Grey System Theory for a model-based lithium-ion battery life evaluation system [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 267:366-379.

[29] Dong Z, Xue L, Song Y, et al. On-Line Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Optimized Gray Model GM(1,1)[J]. Batteries, 2017, 3(3):21.

[30] Zhengxin Zhang, Xiaosheng Si, Changhua Hu, et al. Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 271(3): 775-796.

[31] Dong G, Chen Z, Wei J, et al. Battery Health Prognosis Using Brownian Motion Modeling and Particle Filtering [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018:1-1.

[32] Guang Jin, David E. Matthews, Zhongbao Zhou. A Bayesian framework for on-line degradation assessment and residual life prediction of secondary batteries inspacecraft [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 113: 7-20.

[33] Bing Long, Weiming Xian, Lin Jiang. Zhen Liu et al. An improved autoregressive model by particle swarm optimization for prognostics of lithium-ion batteries [J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2013, 53(6): 821-831.

[34] Yujie Wang, Rui Pan, Duo Yang, et al. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-ion Battery Based on Discrete Wavelet Transform[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 105: 2053-2058.

[35] Wei Qin, Huichun Lv, Chengliang Liu, et al. Remaining useful life prediction for lithium-ion batteries using particle filter and artificial neural network[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2019, 120(2): 312-328.

[36] Chang Y, Fang H, Zhang Y. A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery [J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 206(nov.15):1564-1578.

[37] Hancheng Dong, Xiaoning Jin, Yangbing Lou, et al. Lithium-ion battery state of health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction based on support vector regression-particle filter[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 271:114-123.