Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(17); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031719.

Energy Dissipation Analysis of FRP Concrete Steel Tube under Multiple Impact

Author(s)

Guoliang Zhai1,3, Ping Lu1,2, Haibo Wang3, Shilei Zhang1, Manli Zhang1

Corresponding Author:
Guoliang Zhai
Affiliation(s)

1School of Architectural Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou 451150, Henan, China

2School of management Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China

3School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan 232001, Anhui, China

Abstract

In order to study the effects of wall thickness and impact times on the splitting tensile properties of FRP pipe concrete steel pipe, the dynamic impact test of FRP pipe concrete steel pipe is carried out by using the separated Hopkinson compression bar system with a diameter of 74mm. By changing the wall thickness and impact times, the variation laws of FRP concrete dynamic characteristics under different conditions are analyzed. The test results show that the increase of FRP pipe thickness greatly improves the load resistance of the specimen, the increase of FRP pipe thickness greatly improves the toughness and fatigue resistance of the specimen, and the energy absorption capacity of FRP pipe material is better than that of concrete; In terms of failure mode, the increase of FRP pipe thickness significantly enhances the protection ability of the specimen.

Keywords

FRP pipe concrete steel pipe, SHPB, Energy dissipation, Crushing form

Cite This Paper

Guoliang Zhai, Ping Lu, Haibo Wang, Shilei Zhang, Manli Zhang. Energy Dissipation Analysis of FRP Concrete Steel Tube under Multiple Impact. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 17: 127-134. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031719.

References

[1] Sami H. Rizkalla, Amir Z. Fam. Confinement model for axially loaded concrete confined by circular fiber - reinforced polymer tubes [J]. ACI structural journal, 2001, 98(4): 451-461.

[2] Won-Kee Hong, Hee-Cheul Kim, Suk-Han Yoon. Lateral behavior of full-scale concrete-filled carbon composite columns [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 31(2): 189-203.

[3] Che yuan. Development of CFRP concrete filled steel tubular column steel beam joints [J]. Henan science and technology, 2020, 39(25): 90-92.

[4] Shi Yatao, Hu Zhongjun, Tan Mingrui, Li Xin, song Xuejiao. Experimental study on axial compression performance of concrete filled square steel tubular short columns restrained by CFRP sheets [J / OL]. Concrete: 1-7 [2020-12-15].

[5] Mingxue Liu, Jiaru Qian. Moment-curvature relationship of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular members [J]. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1).

[6] T. Yu, Y.L. Wong, J.G. Teng. Technical Papers: Behavior of Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns Subjected to Eccentric Compression [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2010, 13(5).

[7] Togay Ozbakkaloglu, Butje Louk Fanggi. Axial Compressive Behavior of FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns Made of Normal- and High-Strength Concrete [J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2013.

[8] J. Yao, T. Jiang, P. Xu, Z. G. Lu. Experimental Investigation on Large-scale Slender FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns Subjected to Eccentric Compression [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2015, 18(10).

[9] Tao Yu, Chunwa Chan, Lip Teh, J. G. Teng. Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Multitube Concrete Columns: Concept and Behavior [J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2017, 21(6).

[10] Lindholm U A. Some experiments with the split Hopkinson pressure bar [J]. Mech Phys Solid, 1964, 12(S):317-385.

[11] Song Luo, Fengqiang Gong, Li Chen. Experimental and Numerical Analyses of the Rational Loading Waveform in SHPB Test for Rock Materials [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018.

[12] Gao Hua, Xiong Chao, Yin Jun Hui. Experimental study on dynamic compressive mechanical properties of aluminum foam under repeated impact and constitutive model [J]. Journal of Ordnance Engineering, 2018, 39 (12):2410-2419.

[13] Zhang Z X, Kou S Q, Jiang L G, Effects of loading rate on rock fracture: fracture characteristics and energy partitioning [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(5): 745-762.

[14] Li Miao, Qiao Lan, Li Qingwen. Energy dissipation analysis of SHPB splitting test of prefabricated single joint rock under high strain rate [J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 2017, 39 (07): 1336-1343.

[15] Li Tongqing, Peng Yuxing. Study on crushing characteristics and energy dissipation of magnetite based on SHPB test [J]. Nonferrous metals (beneficiation), 2020 (01): 69-75.