International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2021, 3(18); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2021.031808.
Jinyu Xu, Mo Lan
Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
To realize the low-carbon development of the regional economy, it is inseparable from the support of low-carbon logistics. The logistics industry will play an important role in the development of the regional low-carbon economy. The purpose of this article is to study the carbon emission assessment of integrated port logistics based on the low-carbon environment. First, it summarizes the domestic and foreign related low-carbon emission reduction research; secondly, it analyzes the factors that affect the port low-carbon emission reduction efficiency; then summarizes the port low-carbon emission reduction efficiency evaluation indicators and the port integrated logistics carbon in a low-carbon environment. Construction of emission assessment system. Finally, taking M Port as an example, the data envelopment method and principal component analysis method are used to realize the evaluation of the low-carbon emission reduction efficiency of Dalian Port. The experimental results show that in terms of service types, the emissions of logistics services account for the vast majority, basically reaching 80%, so reducing the carbon emissions of logistics services will be the top priority.
Low-carbon environment, Integrated logistics, Port logistics, Carbon emission assessment
Jinyu Xu, Mo Lan. Carbon Emission Assessment of Port Integrated Logistics in Low-carbon Environment. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2021), Vol. 3, Issue 18: 55-60. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2021.031808.
[1] Aljuneidi T., Bulgak A A. Carbon footprint for designing reverse logistics network with hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems [J]. Journal of Remanufacturing, 2020, 10(2):107-126.
[2] Kijewska K., Krupa M., Iwan S. Risk assessment of international urban logistics projects on the Low Carbon Logistics example [J]. AUTOBUSY – Technika Eksploatacja Systemy Transportowe, 2019, 20(1-2):445-451.
[3] Jiang X., Li J., Lu Y., et al. Design of Reverse Logistics Network for Remanufacturing Waste Machine Tools Based on Multi-Objective Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, PP (99):1-1.
[4] Wong E., Tai A H., So S. Container drayage modelling with graph theory-based road connectivity assessment for sustainable freight transportation in new development area[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 149(2):106810.
[5] Sarkar B., Ullah M., Kim N. Environmental and economic assessment of closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing and returnable transport items [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 111(sep.):148-163.
[6] Deng F., Xu L., Y Fang, et al. PCA-DEA-tobit regression assessment with carbon emission constraints of China's logistics industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 271(8):122548.
[7] Yang J., Tang L., Mi Z., et al. Carbon emissions performance in logistics at the city level [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 231(SEP.10):1258-1266.
[8] Bo D., Kangcheng D., Guang C., et al. Carbon Emission Management System of Port Logistics based on Internet of Things Technology[J]. Agro Food Industry Hi Tech, 2017, 28(1):1094-1098.
[9] Wang S., Zhen L., Psaraftis H N. Three potential benefits of the EU and IMO's landmark efforts to monitor carbon dioxide emissions from shipping [J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, 8(2):310-311.
[10] Laghrabli S., Benabbou L., Berrado A. Mapping Supplier Selection Methods and Criteria in the Scoring and Assessment Sourcing Process: Case of Logistics Activities [J]. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 2020, 35(1):1.
[11] Liang Y., Liu L., Huang J. Integrating the SD-CLUE-S and InVEST models into assessment of oasis carbon storage in northwestern China [J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(2):e0172494.
[12] Duan H., Hu M., Zuo J., et al. Assessing the carbon footprint of the transport sector in mega cities via streamlined life cycle assessment: a case study of Shenzhen, South China [J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22(5):683-693.