Community is the end of public service and governance system and the link between country and society. Community governance is the experimental field of multi-subject cooperative governance. With the gradual rise of social organizations, how to realize the grass-roots community governance of multi-governance has become a problem worth studying. This paper adopts the practical case of community government-society cooperation in S District, Starting from the establishment of community affairs access system, community party building pattern, social organization cultivation system, multiple governance carriers and other measures, Find out the problems in the practice process, analyze the surface causes and internal logic, and finally put forward four measures and suggestions, such as changing ideas, separating residence from station, system guarantee and professional norms, to provide reference for the formation of a benign interactive social governance pattern of multiple subjects.

Tianxiang Du. Research on Urban Community Governance Practice from the Perspective of Cooperative Governance: Take S District of Shenyang as an example. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2021) Vol. 3, Issue 10: 65-73. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2021.031012.

[1] Jing Yijia (2015). Cooperative governance: the path of history and reality. Nanjing Social Sciences, vol.25, no.5, p.1-9.

[2] Zhang Kangzhi (2012). Cooperative governance is the destination of social governance reform. Social Science Research, vol.33, no.3, p.35-42.

[3] Yan Jiahua, Lu Wei(2015). The concepts and relationships of consultative governance, collaborative governance, collaborative governance and cooperative governance. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), vol.39, no.2, p.14-18.

[4] Jiang Xiaoping, Tian Zhao(2019). Empowerment: A new sample of party building leading urban community governance. Journal of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (National School of Administration), vol.23, no.5, p.64-71.

[5] Song Xiongwei(2019). Institutional Environment and Action Strategy of Social Organizations Participating in Urban Community Governance. Jiangsu Social Sciences, vol.39, no.2, p.155-164.

[6] Wang Defu (2017). Discrimination and Reflection on Community Autonomy. Journal of Yunnan Administration College, vol.19, no.2, p.13-20.

[7] Wang Xing(2012). The practice of "separation of residence and station" and the innovation of urban grass-roots social management [J]. Xue Hai, vol.22, no.3, p.31-3.

[8] Wuhou District Civil Affairs Bureau(2008).Wuhou District explores the new community management system of "separation of residence and station". China Civil Affairs, vol.24, no.1, p.56.

[9] Jiang Xiaoping, Dong Jiaming(2019). Three-dimensional theoretical cognition of urban social governance: background, characteristics and bright colors. China Administration, vol.34,no.5, p.60-66.