Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2021, 3(12); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2021.031205.

Do Environmental Information Disclosure Policies Inhibit or Promote China’s Export Growth?

Author(s)

Hongyuan Zhao

Corresponding Author:
Hongyuan Zhao
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China

Abstract

Using 29 Chinese provincial and municipal data from 2008 to 2017,We construct a stochastic frontier production model of trade to study the effects of environmental information disclosure (EID) policies on China’s export growth. Our analysis shows that:At aggregate level, the EID policies inhibit China’s export growth, while there are significant stage differences. From 2008 to 2013, the EID policies significantly inhibit China’s export growth. From 2013 to 2017, the effect of EID policies on export growth change from inhibiting export growth to promoting export growth. Research on the impact mechanism shows,the EID policies inhibit export growth through cost increase effect and social effect, and promote export growth through innovation compensation effect. The main reasons why the impact of EID policies on exports has changed from inhibition to promotion are that the cost increase effect and social effect are gradually weakening over time while the innovation compensation effect is gradually increasing over time. 

Keywords

Environmental information disclosure policies,China’s export growth,Stochastic frontier model of trade

Cite This Paper

Hongyuan Zhao. Do Environmental Information Disclosure Policies Inhibit or Promote China’s Export Growth?. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2021) Vol. 3, Issue 12: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2021.031205.

References

[1] Fang Jiayu,LiuCenjie,Gao Chao. The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports: evidence from EID policies policy in China. [J]. Environmental science and pollution research international,2019, 26(36): 37101–37113.

[2] ZhenggeTu,TianyangHu,Renjun Shen. Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure[J]. China Economic Review,2019,55.

[3] Yutong Lin,RutingHuang,Xin Yao. Air pollution and EID policies: An empirical study based on heavy polluting industries[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278.

[4] Najid Ahmad,Hong-Zhou Li,Xian-Liang Tian. Increased firm profitability under a nationwide EID policies program? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,230.

[5] Qian Zhang,WanyingChen,Yanchao Feng. The effectiveness of China's EID policies at the corporate level: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling,2021,164

[6] Lu Juan, Li Bin, Li HeWill EID policies promote enterprise export [J]International trade issues, 2020 (08): 100-114

[7] Yang Ye, Xie JianguoEID policies system and Chinese enterprises' export domestic added value rate [J / OL]Economic management: [2020-11-03] 1-20

[8] Geng Jianxin, Shang Huijun, Liu changcuiAn ideal framework for enterprise EID policies and regulation [J]Environmental protection, 2007 (08): 26-31

[9] Fang Ying, Guo JunjieWhether China's EID policies policy is effective: a study based on the response of capital market [J]Economic research, 2018,53 (10): 158-174

[10] Kang Zhiyong, Zhang Ning, Tang Xueliang, Liu XinDoes the "carbon reduction" policy restrict the export of Chinese enterprises [J]China industrial economy, 2018 (09): 117-135

[11] Li Zhaohua, Wu MengPhased Evolution and regional distribution differences of China's export growth impetus since reform and opening up [J]Research on quantitative economy and technical economy, 2017,34 (07): 108-123

[12] Zhang Jun, Wu Guiying, Zhang JipengEstimation of China's inter provincial physical capital stock: 1952-2000 [J]Economic research, 2004 (10): 35-44

[13] Zhang Chen, Chen Yantong, Cheng FeiResearch on the effectiveness of EID policies in management discussion and analysis -- from the perspective of ownership nature and media Governance [J]Economic issues, 2019 (10): 121-129