People can learn more about the latest developments in the country, government, and enterprises through the Internet, and at the same time, they can put forward opinions and suggestions in time and participate in public crisis events. The purpose of this article to study the role of smart media communication on social governance is to improve the modernization level of social governance. This article mainly uses the method of investigation and case analysis to analyze the application of smart media communication in social governance. The survey results show that 66% of people agree with its role in social governance. Therefore, smart media can still play a role in social governance.

Linyu Zhao. Social Governance of Smart Media Communication. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 1: 33-38. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040107.

[1] Servaes J. Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change || Capacity Building and People's Participation in e-Governance: Challenges and Prospects for Digital India[J]. 2018, 10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8( Chapter 12-1):1-18.

[2] Critch field TS, Becirevic A, DD Reed. On the Social Validity of Behavior-Analytic Communication: a Call for Research and Description of One Method[J]. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2017, 33(1):1 -twenty three.

[3] Hailu [email protected] Wu Jianhua School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China. The Use of Academic Social Networking Sites in Scholarly Communication: Scoping Review[J]. Data and Information Management, 2021, 5(2):277-298.

[4] Sterpin Lucas [email protected] Ortiz Sofía Soledad Formoso Jésica Barreyro Juan Pablo School of Psychology, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Argentina. The role of innovation in vocabul. knowledge-Argentina. analysis[J]. Psychology of Language and Communication, 2021, 25(1):168-193.

[5] Berg A, Verhoeven J. Understanding social media governance: seizing opportunities, staying out of trouble[J]. Corporate Communications an International Journal, 2017, 22(1):149-164.

[6] Jrgensen Rikke Frank Zuleta Lumi the Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen, Denmark. Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms[J]. Nordicom Review, 2020, 41(1):51-67.

[7] Diehl S, Karmasin M, Mueller B, et al. [CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance] Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication || The World Wide Web and the Social Media as Tools of CSR Communication[J]. 2017, 10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1(Chapter 11):193-210.

[8] Diehl S, Karmasin M, Mueller B, et al. [CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance] Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication || CSR as an Economic, Ethical, and Communicative Concept[J]. 2017, 10.1007/978 -3-319-44700-1(Chapter 3): 37-50.

[9] Rahim M. Improving Social Responsibility in RMG Industries Through a New Governance Approach in Laws[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 143(4):1-20.

[10] Blanchard JM, Lin KC. Governance, Domestic Change, and Social Policy in China in Historical Perspective[J]. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2017, 10.1057/978-1-137-02285-1(Chapter 1):1- 20.

[11] Blanchard JM, Lin KC. Governance, Domestic Change, and Social Policy in China || Reasons to Dam: China's Hydropower Politics and Its Socio-Environmental Consequences[J]. 2017, 10.1057/978-1-137-02285- 1(Chapter 5):103-127.

[12] Qiang L, Lu Z, Hao W. Bringing Society Back In: The New Qinghe Experiment and Social Governance in China[J]. Korea journal, 2018, 58(1):70-95.